非常规油气致密储集层微观结构研究进展*

doi:10.7605/gdlxb.2013.05.049

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (2)
点击分布统计
下载分布统计

全文: PDF (927 KB) RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

摘要

致密储集层储集性能差, 孔喉以纳米级为主, 孔喉连通复杂。中国南方高过成熟海相页岩有机质纳米孔与粒内孔大小约为20～890 nm；陆相泥页岩孔喉类型为有机质孔与基质孔, 主体介于30～200 nm之间；致密砂岩微米级孔喉为粒间溶孔、颗粒溶蚀孔与微裂缝, 主体介于10～200μm之间, 纳米级孔隙大小介于70～400 nm之间, 以原生粒间孔与自生矿物晶间孔为主；致密灰岩孔喉类型有方解石粒内溶孔、粒间溶孔与微裂缝, 大小介于50～500 nm之间。页岩微孔喉总体随热演化程度增高呈先减少后增加趋势, 致密含油砂岩中油气赋存有4种状态, 粒间微孔为油气赋存最有利位置。针对非常规油气储集层独特特征, 仍需在仪器研发、技术方法与评价参数等方面加强研究探索。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	朱如凯
	白斌
	崔景伟
	吴松涛
	崔京钢
	王拓
	牛露
	李婷婷

关键词 ：非常规油气储集层, 微观孔喉表征, 孔喉演化, 油气赋存状态

Abstract：

Nano-pores dominate the storage space of tight reservoirs and the connectivity of pore throat system is complex. The diameter of organic matter pores and intra-particle pores in marine shale with high maturity of southern China are 20～890 nm. The pores in terrestrial shale are organic matter pores and matrix pores, with diameter between 30～200 nm. The storage space in tight sandstone includes dissolution pores and micro-fractures with diameter in 10～200 μm. Nano-pores are composed by inter-particle pores and inter-crystal pores with diameter 70～400 nm. The calcite dissolution pores, inter-particle dissolution pores and micro-fractures dominate the nano-pores in tight limestones and the diameter is 50～500 nm. Reservoir digenetic modeling data indicates that total porosity in shale increases firstly and decreased later with the increase of|temperature and pressure. Four occurrences of oil in nano-pores have been distinguished and inter-particle pores are the most favorable for the oil accumulation. Moreover, due to the special characteristics of unconventional oil and gas, further work should be focused on the instrument improvement, technology innovation and evaluation parameter optimization.

Key words： unconventional oil and gas reservoir micro-pore throat characterization pore throat evolution oil and gas occurrence

收稿日期: 2013-05-11 出版日期: 2013-10-01

ZTFLH:

P588.24+5

基金资助:

国家科技重大专项(编号：2011ZX05001-002)、国家自然科学青年基金项目(编号：41002034)、中国石油勘探开发研究院级基金(编号：2012Y-007)联合资助

作者简介: 朱如凯, 男, 1968年生, 博士, 现任中国石油勘探开发研究院实验中心副主任, 油气储集层重点实验室主任, 主要从事沉积储集层研究。E-mail: zrk@petroChina.com.cn。

引用本文:

朱如凯,白斌,崔景伟等. 非常规油气致密储集层微观结构研究进展*[J]. 古地理学报, 2013, 15(5): 615-623.

Zhu Rukai,Bai Bin,Cui Jingwei et al. Research advances of microstructure in unconventional tight oil and gas reservoirs[J]. JOPC, 2013, 15(5): 615-623.

链接本文:

http://journal09.magtechjournal.com/gdlxb/CN/10.7605/gdlxb.2013.05.049 或 http://journal09.magtechjournal.com/gdlxb/CN/Y2013/V15/I5/615

白斌, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 2013. 利用多尺度CT成像表征致密砂岩微观孔喉结构[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(3): 329-333.

崔景伟, 邹才能, 朱如凯, 等. 2012. 页岩孔隙研究新进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 27(12): 1319-1325.

樊中海. 2008. 扇三角洲体系储集层识别及精细构成研究：以泌阳凹陷赵凹油田为例[M]. 湖北：武汉：中国地质大学出版社.

邹才能, 朱如凯, 白斌, 等. 2011. 中国油气储集层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值[J]. 岩石学报, 27(6): 1857-1864.

邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 2012. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望：以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 33(2): 173-187.

Ambrose R, Hartman R, Diaz-Campos M, et al. 2012. Shale Gas-in-Place Calculations Part Ⅰ: New Pore-Scale Considerations[J]. SPE Journal, 17(1): 219-229.

Brown M, Ozkan E, Raghavan R, et al. 2009. Practical solutions for pressure transient responses of fractured horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs[C]. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.

Curtis M E, Amobrose R J, Sondergeld C H, et al. 2010. Structural Characterization of Gas Shales on the Micro-and Nano-Scales[C]. Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Curtis M, Ambrose R, Sondergeld C, et al. 2011. Transmission and scanning electron microscopy investigation of pore connectivity of gas shales on the nanoscale[C]. North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition.

Desbois G, Urai J L, Kukla P A. 2009. Morphology of the pore space in claystones-evidence from BIB/FIB ion beam sectioning and cryo-SEM observations: Earth, 4: 15-22.

Desbois G, Enzmann F, Urai J L, et al. 2010. Imaging pore space in tight gas sandstone reservoir: Insights from broad ion beam cross-sectioning[C]. EPJ Web of conferences 6, 22022

Fishman N S, Hackley P C, Lowers H A, et al. 2013. The nature of porosity in organic rich mudstones of Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge clay formation, North Sea, offshore United Kingdom[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology. 103:32-50.

Etherington J, Aguilera R. 2012. Using the SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE/SEG PRMS To Evaluate Unconventional Resources[J]. SPE Economics & Management, 4(2): 119-127.

Gouth F, Galliero G, Wang J, et al. 2013. Molecular Simulation To Determine Key Shale Gas Parameters, And Their Use In A Commercial Simulator For Production Forecasting[C]. 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE Europe.

Haskett W, Brown P. 2005. Evaluation of unconventional resource plays[C]. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.

Holditch S. 2006. Tight gas sands[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 58(6): 86-93.

Hover V C, Peacor D R, Walter L M. 1996. STEM/AEM evidence for preservation of burial diagenetic fabrics in Devonian shales: Implications for fluid/rock interaction in cratonic basins(USA)[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 66(3): 519-530.

Klaver J, Desbois G, Urai J L, et al. 2013. FIB-SEM study of the pore space morphology in early mature Posidonia shale from the Hils area, Germany[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 103: 12-25.

Loucks R G, Reed R M, Ruppel S C. 2012. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 96(6): 1071-1098.

Lu J, Milliken K, Reed R M, et al. 2011. Diagenesis and sealing capacity of the middle Tuscaloosa mudstone at the Cranfield carbon dioxide injection site, Mississippi, USA[J]. Environmental Geosciences, 18(1): 35-53.

Milner M, McLin R, Petriello J. 2010. Imaging texture and porosity in mudstones and shales: Comparison of secondary and ion milled backscatter SEM methods in Canadian Unconventional Resources & International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Canadian Society for Unconventional Gas, October, CUSG/SSPE 138975: 10

Murphy M, Daniels J, Cole D, et al. 2012. Pore Distribution in the Ordovician Shale of the Utica/Point Pleasant Sub-Basin[C]. AAPG annual convention & exhibition;abstracts volume.

Nelson P H. 2009. Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 93(3): 329-340.

Schieber J. 2010. Common themes in the formation and preservation of porosity in shales and mudstones-illustrated with examples across the Phanerozoic, in Proceedings, SPE Unconventional Gas Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 23-25 February：12.

Schmoker J W, Fouch T D, Charpentier R R. 1996. Gas in the Uinta Basin, Utah-resouces in continous accumulations[J]. Mountain Geology, 33(4): 95-104.

Slatt R M, OBrien N R. 2011. Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales: Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 95(12): 2017-2030.