Types and superposed patterns of distributary channels in a shallow lacustrine delta plain
He Tingting1, Li Shengli1, Gao Xingjun2, Song Cen1, Zhou Xinmao2, He Dongxu3
1 China University of Geosciences(Beijing),Beijing.100083 2 Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,Beijing.100083 3 Shengli oil production plant of Shengli Oilfield Co.,Sinopec, Dongying.257000,Shandong
Abstract:Shallow lacustrine deltas are well-developed in many continental basins in China. Distributary channel is the main type of the sand body in a delta plain. Most of distributary channels are characterized by frequent diversion,multistage cross and superposition,which usually formed superposed distribution pattern of complex reservoirs. Based on the well-logging of distributary channel sand bodies of the shallow delta plain in Songliao Basin,this paper summarizes channel types and superposed patterns of the distributary channels in the shallow delta plain.Further,the constraint effect of these patterns on the correlation of sand bodies is analyzed. Study shows that channel types of the distributary channels can be classified into three foundational types,including an atypical braided channel type,an atypical meandering channel type and a transitional type. Small scale,shallow cutting and fast branching are the common features of these three channel types. In addition,there are five foundational superposed patterns of the distributary channels. And there are two foundational mud interbed distributions in distributary channels based on channel types and superposed patterns of the distributary channels,such as parallel distributed mud interbeds and low-angle lateral-accretion mud interbeds. Finally,in terms of channel types and superposed patterns,the changed position of certain channel types and the connection of sand bodies between boreholes can be determined,then constraint the reservoir correlation and connection analysis of the sand bodies.
He Tingting,Li Shengli,Gao Xingjun et al. Types and superposed patterns of distributary channels in a shallow lacustrine delta plain[J]. JOPC, 2014, 16(5): 597-604.
李胜利,于兴河,张志杰,等. 2004. 珠江口盆地西江30-2油田新近系中新统沉积微相及层序地层分析[J]. 古地理学报,6(1):36-38. 柳成志,辛仁臣,王刚. 1998. 松辽盆地北部头台地区扶余油层浅水湖泊三角洲沉积特征[J]. 大庆石油学院学报,22(1):68-70. 楼章华,兰翔,卢庆梅,等. 1999. 地形、气候与湖面波动对浅水三角洲沉积环境的控制作用[J]. 地质学报,73(1):83-91. 梅志超,林晋炎. 1991. 湖泊三角洲的地层模式和骨架砂体的特征[J]. 沉积学报,9(4):1-11. 隋军,吕晓光,赵翰卿,等. 2000. 大庆油田河流—三角洲相储集层研究[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,213-222. 王家豪,姚光庆,袁彩萍,等. 2001. 焉耆盆地宝浪油田宝北区块辫状分流河道砂体储集层宏观特征[J]. 现代地质,15(4):431-437. 王建功,王天琦,卫平生,等. 2007. 大型坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲沉积模式: 以松辽盆地北部葡萄花油层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏,19(2):28-34. 王健. 2010. 储集层隔夹层模型研究[D]. 黑龙江大庆:大庆石油学院,32-38. 薛培华. 1991. 河流点坝相储集层模式概论[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,51-56. 席胜利,李文厚,刘新社,等. 2009. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区下二叠统太原组浅水三角洲沉积特征[J]. 古地理学报,11(2):187-194. 姚光庆,马正,赵彦超,等. 1995. 浅水三角洲分流河道储集层砂体特征[J]. 石油学报,16(1):1-8. 于兴河. 2008. 碎屑岩系油气储集层沉积学(第二版)[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,276-279,362. 于兴河,李胜利.2009. 碎屑岩系油气储集层沉积学的发展历程与热点问题思考[J]. 沉积学报,27(5):880-895. 张昌民,尹太举,张尚锋,等. 2005. 双河油田陆架型扇三角洲的沉积机理及向上变粗层序的成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质,26(1):99-103. 朱筱敏,张义娜,杨俊生,等. 2008. 准噶尔盆地侏罗系辫状河三角洲沉积特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质,29(2):244-251. 邹才能,赵文智,张兴阳,等. 2008. 大型敞流坳陷湖盆浅水三角洲与湖盆中心砂体的形成与分布[J]. 地质学报,82(6):813-825. Barrell J. 1992. Criteria for the recognition of ancient delta deposits[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin,23(4):377-446. Donaldson A C. 1974. Pennsylvanian sedimentation of central Appalachians[J]. The Geological Society of America,148(Special Paper):47-48. Fisk H N. 1960. Bar-finger sand of the Mississippi delta[A]. In: 45th Annual Meeting[C]. New Jersey:AAPG,29-52. Gilbert G K. 1985. The topographic features of lakeshores[J]. Annual Report of US Geology Survey,5(5):75-123. Horne J C,Ferm J C,Baganz B P. 1976. Depositional models in coal exploration and miner planning in Appalachian region[J]. AAPG Bulletin,62(12):2377-2411. Postma G. 1990. An analysis of the variation in delta architecture[J]. Terra Nova,2(2):124-130. Stanley K O,Surdam R C. 1978. Sedimentation on the front of Eocene Gilbert-Type deltas,Washakie Wyoming[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,48(2):557-573.