中国早寒武世岩相古地理

doi:10.7605/gdlxb.2002.01.001

Abstract
Figure/Table
References()
Related Citation (15)
Read Tracking
Download Tracking

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) Supporting Info

Abstract

“China” in this paper refers to the mainland and land areas of Hainan Island and Taiwan. The paper is composed of two lithofacies paleogeography maps of China of the early and late ages of the Early Cambrian and corresponding explanation text. The most important characteristics of these two maps are "two troughs alternating with three platforms". The two troughs are the Tianshan–Beishan–Mongolia–Liaoning–Jilin Trough and the Kunlun–Qinling Trough. The three platforms are the Junggar–Mengolia–Xinganling Platform,Tarim–Qaidam–North China Platform, and Tibet–South China Platform. The boundaries of these two troughs and three platforms are defined on the basis of tectonics, strata, rocks, lithofacies and other data. Most of the boundaries are accurate, and only in some places they are inferred. The Tianshan–Beishan Trough can be further divided into secondary lithofacies paleogeography units, but other troughs are difficult to be subdivided. Among the three platforms, South China, North China and Northwest China are well studied, their secondary lithofacies paleogeography units are defined on the basis of accurate quantitative data and quantitative maps, and the lithofacies paleogeography of the early age of the Early Cambrian can be differentiated from that of the late age. Other areas are less well-studied, and secondary lithofacies paleogeography units are difficult to be delineated out. The lithofacies paleogeography maps of these areas are qualitative. Therefor, these two lithofacies paleogeography maps of the Early Cambrian of China are different in study depth for different areas, and are quantitative in some areas and qualitative in other. These maps reflect both the research achievements of the present writers and the present geological study depth of our country. In these maps, merits coexist with flaws, and facts coexist with inference. Welcome criticism from the readers.

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Published: 01 February 2002

About author: Feng Zengzhao, born in 1926, graduated from the Geology Department of Tsinghua University in 1952. Now he is a professor in University of Petroleum (Beijing), and is engaged in sedimentology and palaeogeography

Cite this article:

. LITHOFACIES PALAEOGEOGRPHY OF THE EARLY CAMBRIAM IN CHINA[J]. JOURNAL OF PALAEOGEOGRAPHY, 2002, 4(1): 1-12.

. LITHOFACIES PALAEOGEOGRPHY OF THE EARLY CAMBRIAM IN CHINA[J]. JOPC, 2002, 4(1): 1-12.

URL:

http://journal09.magtechjournal.com/gdlxb/EN/10.7605/gdlxb.2002.01.001 OR http://journal09.magtechjournal.com/gdlxb/EN/Y2002/V4/I1/1

[1] 冯增昭. 华北下奥陶统岩相古地理新探. 华东石油学院学报，1977, (3) :57—79
[2] 冯增昭.华北早奥陶世岩相古地理新探. 地质科学，1979,(4):302—313
[3] 冯增昭. 陕甘宁晋及内蒙古地区奥陶纪岩相古地理新探. 地质论评，1983,(1):17—24
[4] 冯增昭. 华北地台东部晋冀鲁京津地区早奥陶世岩相古地理. 沉积学报，1986,4(4):28—40
[5] Feng Zengzhao, Chen Jixin，Wu Shenghe. Lithofacies paleogeography of Early Paleozoic of North China Platform. Acta Sidimentologica Sinica, 1989,7(4):15—55
[6] 冯增昭，陈继新. 华北地台中寒武世张夏期岩相古地理. 见: 《纪念文集》编委会编, 冯景兰教授诞辰90周年纪念文集. 北京:地质出版社, 1990.166—176
[7] 冯增昭,王英华，张吉森,等. 华北地台早古生代岩相古地理. 北京:地质出版社，1990
[8] 冯增昭，陈继新，张吉森. 鄂尔多斯地区早古生代岩相古地理. 北京:地质出版社，1991
[9] 冯增昭，陈继新，张吉森.鄂尔多斯地区奥陶纪岩相古地理. 见: 杨光华主编,石油高等教育四十年科学研究论文集. 山东东营:石油大学出版社, 1993. 11—18
[10] Feng Zengzhao, Jin Zhenkui. Types and origin of dolostones in the Lower Palaeozoic of the North China Platform. Sedimentary Geology, 1994， 93(3—4):279—290
[11] Fang Zengzhao, Zhang Yongsheng, Jin Zhenkui. Type, Origin, and reservoir characteristics of dolostones of the Ordovician Majiagou Group, Ordos, North China Platform. Sedimentary Geology, 1998, 118(1—4):127—140
[12] 冯增昭，鲍志东，张永生，谭健,等.鄂尔多斯奥陶纪地层岩石岩相古地理. 北京:地质出版社, 1998
[13] 冯增昭，鲍志东.鄂尔多斯奥陶纪马家沟期岩相古地理. 沉积学报，1999,17(1):1—8
[14] 冯增昭,张家强,金振奎,鲍志东,王国力. 中国西北地区寒武纪岩相古地理. 古地理学报,2000,2(2):1—10
[15] 冯增昭，张家强，金振奎，鲍志东，王国力. 中国西北地区奥陶纪岩相古地理. 古地理学报，2000,2(3):1—14
[16] 冯增昭，张家强，王国力，金振奎，鲍志东. 中国西北地区寒武纪和奥陶纪岩相古地理. 山东东营：石油大学出版社，2000
[17] 冯增昭,彭勇民,金振奎,蒋盘良,鲍志东,罗璋,鞠天吟,田海芹,汪红. 中国南方寒武纪和奥陶纪岩相古地理. 北京:地质出版社, 2001
[18] 冯增昭，彭勇民，金振奎，蒋盘良，鲍志东，罗璋，鞠天吟，田海芹，汪红. 中国南方寒武纪岩相古地理. 古地理学报，2001, 3(1):1—14
[19] 冯增昭，彭勇民，金振奎，蒋盘良，鲍志东，罗璋，鞠天吟，田海芹，汪红. 中国南方早奥陶世岩相古地理. 古地理学报，2001,3(2):11—22
[20] 冯增昭，彭勇民，金振奎，蒋盘良，鲍志东，罗璋，鞠天吟，田海芹，汪红. 中国南方中及晚奥陶世岩相古地理. 古地理学报，2001,3(4):10—24
[21] 新疆维吾尔自治区地质矿产局.新疆维吾尔自治区区域地质志，北京:地质出版社,1993
[22] 内蒙古自治区地质矿产局. 内蒙古自治区区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1991
[23] 吉林省地质矿产局.吉林省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1989
[24] 黑龙江地质矿产局. 黑龙江省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1996
[25] 辽宁省地质矿产局. 辽宁省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1989
[26] 西藏自治区地质矿产局. 西藏自治区区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1993
[27] 青海省地质矿产局. 青海省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1991
[28] 甘肃省地质矿产局. 甘肃省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1989
[29] 四川省地质矿产局. 四川省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1991
[30] 陕西省地质矿产局. 陕西省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1989
[31] 河南省地质矿产局. 河南省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1989
[32] 湖北省地质矿产局. 湖北省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1990
[33] 安徽省地质矿产局. 安徽省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1987
[34] 云南省地质矿产局. 云南省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1990
[35] 云南省地质矿产局. 云南岩相古地理图集. 云南:云南科技出版社,1995
[36] 广东省地质矿产局. 广东省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1988
[37] 福建省地质矿产局. 福建省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1992
[38] 福建省地质矿产局. 台湾省区域地质志. 北京:地质出版社,1992
[39] 王鸿祯主编. 中国古地理图集. 北京:地图出版社,1985
[40] 中华人民共和国地质矿产部，《中国地质图（1?500万）》编辑委员会. 中国地质图. 北京:地质出版社,1990
[41] 任纪舜，王作勋，陈炳蔚,等. 中国及邻区大地构造图（1:500万）. 北京:地质出版社,1999
[42] 刘宝珺，许效松主编. 中国南方岩相古地理图集. 北京:科学出版社,1994
[43] Feng Zengzhao. Methodology on lithofacies paleogeography of carbonate rocks. In:Tu Guangzhi ed., Advances in science of China. Beijing:Science Press, Earth Sciences, 1987,2:159—175
[44] 冯增昭. 碳酸盐岩岩相古地理学. 北京:石油工业出版社,1989
[45] 冯增昭. 单因素分析综合作图法——岩相古地理方法论. 沉积学报，1992,10(3):70—77
[46] 冯增昭. 单因素分析综合作图法——岩相古地理学方法论. 见: 冯增昭，王英华，刘焕杰，沙庆安，王德发，等, 中国沉积学. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1994. 662—685
[47] 冯增昭，王英华，李尚武,等. 下杨子地区中下三叠统青龙群岩相古地理研究. 云南:云南科技出版社,1988