Journal of Palaeogeography
 
Apr. 8, 2025  Home  |  About JOP  |  Editorial Committee  |  Subscription  |  Message  |  Meetings  |  Call for Papers  |  Contact
Journal of Palaeogeography  2022, Vol. 11 Issue (2): 151-172    DOI: 10.1016/j.jop.2022.03.001
Lithofacies palaeogeography and sedimentology Current Issue| Next Issue| Archive| Adv Search  |  Next
The primary dolostone in the Meso-Neoproterozoic: Cases study on platforms in China
Zhi-Dong Baoa,b,*, Han-Cheng Jia,b, Yuan Wanga, Zong-Feng Lia, Ting Lianga,b, Bo Niua,b, Ming-Yang Weia, Kai Lua, Yan-Qing Shia,b, Hua Zhanga, Pu Wana, Zhuo-Lun Lia, Zhi-Bo Yanga, Rui Liua, Can-Xing Liua, Xu-Lin Zhonga, Xiao-Qi Guoa, Peng-Fei Xianga, Zhong-Xian Caic, Shui-Chang Zhangd
aChina University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, China;
bState Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Ministry of Education, Beijing 102249, China;
cChina University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China;
dPetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China
Download: PDF (43065 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      Supporting Info
Abstract Meso-Neoproterozoic dolostone is abnormally well-developed in the platform areas in China, detailly, in the Mesoproterozoic Calymmian Wumishan Formation of North China Basin, Neoproterozoic Ediacaran Qigbulak Formation of Tarim Basin, and the Neoproterozoic Ediacaran Dengying Formation of Sichuan Basin. The outcrops and drilling cores from these basins show that these dolostones are mostly thick-bedded to massive, with mud-sized to silt-sized crystalline dolostone reaching 86% to 97% of the total dolostone thickness. These dolostones basically suffered no secondary metasomatism, regardless of containing microorganisms (such as algae and bacteria) or not. The analyses of sedimentary palaeogeographic features indicate that: (1) the Meso-Neoproterozoic dolostone nearly covered the entire area basins, and was widely deposited in supratidal to intertidal zones, as well as in open platform environments; (2) the dolostone was subdivided according to the crystalline size, with the distribution controlled by geomorphology, i.e., the pure mud-sized crystalline dolostone developing in depression areas, whereas the grainy mud-sized crystalline dolostone or the mound stromatolitic mud-sized crystalline dolostone developing in uplift areas; (3) deep-water basins developed between the carbonate platforms, and the seismic profiles show that these basins were formed by syngenetic deep faults in the Meso-Neoproterozoic strata. These syngenetic faults increased Mg2+ concentration in the seawater by injecting rich-Mg2+-bearing hydrothermal fluids into the carbonate platforms. The analyses of geochemical and paleoclimatic indexes reveal that there is no obvious difference in carbon and oxygen isotope ratios between dolostones having different textures, with the ratios similar to those of the global seawater of the Meso-Neoproterozoic, indicating that the silt-sized crystalline dolostone has the same sedimentary origin as the mud-sized crystalline dolostone, i.e., the former is from authigenic recrystallization of the latter rather than secondary metasomatism. Therefore, whatever the crystalline sizes are, the dolostones are all originated from sedimentation. All the petrological, sedimentary and geochemical data suggest that the dolostones covering almost the whole Meso-Neoproterozoic typical platform areas of China are of relatively primary sedimentary origin.
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Key words: Thick-bedded to massive dolostone   C-O isotopes   Meso-Neoproterozoic   Tarim Basin   Sichuan Basin   North China Basin     
Received: 26 December 2021
Corresponding Authors: * E-mail address: baozhd@cup.edu.cn (Z.D. Bao).   
Cite this article:   
. The primary dolostone in the Meso-Neoproterozoic: Cases study on platforms in China[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2022, 11(2): 151-172.
. The primary dolostone in the Meso-Neoproterozoic: Cases study on platforms in China[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2022, 11(2): 151-172.
URL:  
http://journal09.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_jop/EN/10.1016/j.jop.2022.03.001     OR     http://journal09.magtechjournal.com/Jweb_jop/EN/Y2022/V11/I2/151
Copyright © 2014 JOURNAL OF PALAEOGEOGRAPHY
Editorial Office of Journal of Palaeogeography, 20 Xueyuan Road, P. O. Box 902, Beijing 100083, China
Tel: +86-10-62394320; +86–10–62396149     Email: Jpalaeo2012@163.com