实用肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 247-251.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3070.2010.03.013

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

GP与NP方案治疗耐药晚期乳腺癌的临床观察

张明辉, 张清媛, 赵曙, 王小川, 马文杰, 徐珊琦, 孙妍   

  1. 哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院内三科(哈尔滨 150081)
  • 收稿日期:2010-03-30 出版日期:2010-06-28 发布日期:2015-01-24
  • 通讯作者: 马文杰,E-mail:malaoshi1972@163.com
  • 作者简介:张明辉,男,(1985-),硕士在读,从事乳腺癌内科基础与临床研究

Clinical observation of GP and NP regimen in patients with advanced breast cancer

ZHANG Minghui, ZHANG Qingyuan, ZHAO Shu, WANG Xiaochuan, MA Wenjie, XU Shanqi, SUN Yan   

  1. The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150081
  • Received:2010-03-30 Online:2010-06-28 Published:2015-01-24

摘要: 目的 比较吉西他滨联合顺铂(GP方案)和长春瑞滨联合顺铂(NP方案)治疗蒽环和(或)紫杉类耐药转移性乳腺癌的近期疗效和安全性。方法 采用GP方案(吉西他滨+顺铂)36例,吉西他滨1000mg/m2静脉滴注,第1,8天给药;顺铂75mg/m2分3次静脉滴注,第1-3天给予。采用NP方案(长春瑞滨+顺铂)32例,长春瑞滨25mg/m2,第1,8天给予;顺铂用法同A组。两方案均每3周重复,2个周期以上评价疗效。结果 两组有效率分别为55.6%(20/36)和53.1%(17/32),无统计学意义(χ2=0.0403,P=0.84)。GP组III-IV度血小板减少高于NP组,但NP组静脉炎相对较明显。结论 GP与NP方案治疗蒽环类和(或)紫杉类耐药的晚期乳腺癌有较高的有效率,可指导临床,且不良反应均可以耐受。

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and cisplatin versus navelbine and cisplatin in anthracycline-and(or)taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer(MBC).Method A total of 68 patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive the regimen of GP(n=36)or NP(n=32).Group GP:Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2,d1,d8;DDP 25mg/m2,d1-3.Group NP:Navelbine 25mg/m2,d1,d8;DDP25mg/m2,d1-3.Two groups were treated at least 2 courses with 3 weeks interval,efficacy was evaluated after 2 courses of chemotherapy.Results The response rate was 55.6%(20/36)in group GP,and 53.1%(17/32)in group NP.The degree III-IV thrombocytopenia was more common in group GP than in the group NP,but the degree phlebitis was more serious in group NP.Conclusion NP and GP for treating refractory metastatic breast have a high response rate,there was no significant difference between two groups(χ2=0.0403,P=0.84).Two groups have tolerable side effects.

中图分类号: