PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY JOURNAL ›› 2010, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 247-251.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3070.2010.03.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical observation of GP and NP regimen in patients with advanced breast cancer

ZHANG Minghui, ZHANG Qingyuan, ZHAO Shu, WANG Xiaochuan, MA Wenjie, XU Shanqi, SUN Yan   

  1. The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150081
  • Received:2010-03-30 Online:2010-06-28 Published:2015-01-24

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and cisplatin versus navelbine and cisplatin in anthracycline-and(or)taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer(MBC).Method A total of 68 patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive the regimen of GP(n=36)or NP(n=32).Group GP:Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2,d1,d8;DDP 25mg/m2,d1-3.Group NP:Navelbine 25mg/m2,d1,d8;DDP25mg/m2,d1-3.Two groups were treated at least 2 courses with 3 weeks interval,efficacy was evaluated after 2 courses of chemotherapy.Results The response rate was 55.6%(20/36)in group GP,and 53.1%(17/32)in group NP.The degree III-IV thrombocytopenia was more common in group GP than in the group NP,but the degree phlebitis was more serious in group NP.Conclusion NP and GP for treating refractory metastatic breast have a high response rate,there was no significant difference between two groups(χ2=0.0403,P=0.84).Two groups have tolerable side effects.

CLC Number: