PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY JOURNAL ›› 2010, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 247-251.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3070.2010.03.013
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Minghui, ZHANG Qingyuan, ZHAO Shu, WANG Xiaochuan, MA Wenjie, XU Shanqi, SUN Yan
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and cisplatin versus navelbine and cisplatin in anthracycline-and(or)taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer(MBC).Method A total of 68 patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive the regimen of GP(n=36)or NP(n=32).Group GP:Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2,d1,d8;DDP 25mg/m2,d1-3.Group NP:Navelbine 25mg/m2,d1,d8;DDP25mg/m2,d1-3.Two groups were treated at least 2 courses with 3 weeks interval,efficacy was evaluated after 2 courses of chemotherapy.Results The response rate was 55.6%(20/36)in group GP,and 53.1%(17/32)in group NP.The degree III-IV thrombocytopenia was more common in group GP than in the group NP,but the degree phlebitis was more serious in group NP.Conclusion NP and GP for treating refractory metastatic breast have a high response rate,there was no significant difference between two groups(χ2=0.0403,P=0.84).Two groups have tolerable side effects.
CLC Number:
R730.53
ZHANG Minghui, ZHANG Qingyuan, ZHAO Shu, WANG Xiaochuan, MA Wenjie, XU Shanqi, SUN Yan. Clinical observation of GP and NP regimen in patients with advanced breast cancer[J]. PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 24(3): 247-251.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
URL: http://www.syzlxzz.com/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1002-3070.2010.03.013
http://www.syzlxzz.com/EN/Y2010/V24/I3/247