西湖凹陷花港组浅水三角洲平原分流河道沉积构型<sup>*</sup>

doi:10.7605/gdlxb.2024.03.049

摘要
图/表
参考文献 (0)
相关文章 (15)
点击分布统计
下载分布统计

全文: PDF (23542 KB) RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

摘要

渐新统花港组上段是东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷中南部地区的主要产油气层位,但对其沉积体系的认识一直存在争议,砂体构型特征及控制因素的研究也相对匮乏。综合运用岩心、测井及地震等资料,研究渐新统花港组上段沉积环境、沉积微相类型、砂体沉积构型特征及其控制因素。结果表明: 西湖凹陷中南部花港组上段以浅水三角洲平原沉积为主,分流河道是最主要的砂体类型。根据弯曲度差异,可将分流河道划分为辫流型(弯曲度1~1.05)、曲流型(弯曲度大于1.15)和辫-曲转换型(弯曲度1.05~1.15)3种类型,其中辫流型分流河道砂体“宽而厚”,平面组合呈交织宽条带状,心滩呈斑点状排列,砂体垂向叠置样式以切叠型为主; 曲流型分流河道砂体“窄而薄”,平面样式为单一条带型或分叉-合并型,厚砂以点坝的形式分布在河道边缘,砂体垂向叠置样式以“孤立型”为主; 辫-曲转换型分流河道是辫流型和曲流型的过渡类型,河道砂体规模中等,河道内心滩和点坝同时发育。3类分流河道的厚度与宽度呈对数正相关,宽厚比具有辫流型>辫-曲转换型>曲流型的特征。推测古地貌和基准面变化是影响浅水三角洲分流河道构型特征的主要因素,其中古地貌控制了分流河道的河型变化,较陡的地形有利于低弯度辫流型分流河道的形成,而长期基准面上升造成了分流河道规模逐渐下降,中期基准面的上升造成了分流河道砂体叠置样式发生切叠型→叠加型→孤立型的演变。研究成果完善了浅水三角洲的沉积构型知识库,对地下浅水三角洲分流河道储集层的预测及开发具有重要的指导意义。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	杨征
	吴胜和
	段冬平
	徐振华
	熊绮聪
	张玉飞

关键词 ：东海陆架盆地, 西湖凹陷, 渐新统, 花港组, 浅水三角洲, 分流河道, 沉积构型

Abstract：

The upper Oligocene Huagang Formation is crucial for oil and gas exploration in the central and southern Xihu sag of the East China Sea Shelf Basin. However,there has been ongoing debate on the sedimentary system,and limited research has been conducted on the characteristics of sand body architecture and the controlling factors. This paper studied the sedimentary environment,microfacies types,sand body architecture,and controlling factors of the upper Oligocene Huagang Formation through a comprehensive analysis of core,logging,and seismic data. The upper Huagang Formation in the central-south part of Xihu sag shows shallow-water delta plain sedimentation,with distributary channels being the predominant type of sand body. These distributary channels are categorized into three types based on their curvature: braided(curvature=1~1.05),meandering(curvature>1.15),and braided-meander transition(curvature=1.05~1.15). The sand bodies found in braided distributary channels are wide and thick,with intertwined wide bands. Channel bars in these channels are arranged in a speckled pattern. The sand body’s vertical stacking style is mainly characterized as incised stacking. In contrast,the sand bodies in meandering channels are narrow and thin,appearing as either single strip type or bifurcation-merging type in the planar direction. Thick sand layers are distributed as point bars in the channel margin,and the vertical stacking style is mostly isolated. The braided-meandering type of diversion channel is a transitional type between braided and meandering channels. It is characterized by moderate-sized channel sand bodies containing inner channel bars and point bars. The thickness and width of these distributary channels are positively correlated in a logarithmic manner. The ratio of width to thickness follows the pattern of braided type>transitional type>meandering type. The architecture characteristics of distributary channels are primarily influenced by paleogeomorphology and changes in base levels. Paleogeomorphology controls changes in channel types within shallow water delta plain,and low curvature braided distributary channels are more likely to develop in steep terrain. As the long-term base level increases,the size of distributary channels decreases,while a rise in mid-term base level has resulted in the transition of distributary channel sand bodies from incised to superimposed and isolated stacking types. This research enhances our understanding of the sedimentary structure of shallow water deltas and provides valuable guidance for predicting and developing distributary channel reservoirs in underground shallow water deltas within oil and gas fields.

Key words： East China Sea Shelf Basin Xihu sag Oligocene Huagang Formation shallow-water delta distributary channel sedimentary architecture

收稿日期: 2023-12-05

ZTFLH:

P512.2

基金资助:

*国家自然科学基金项目(编号: 42272110)资助

通讯作者: 吴胜和,男,1964年生,中国石油大学(北京)教授、博士生导师,主要从事沉积学、储层表征与建模研究。E-mail: reser@cup.edu.cn。

作者简介: 杨征,男,1995年生,中国石油大学(北京)博士研究生,主要从事沉积学、储层表征与建模研究工作。E-mail: 632255079@qq.com。

引用本文:

杨征,吴胜和,段冬平等. 西湖凹陷花港组浅水三角洲平原分流河道沉积构型^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(3): 525-544.

YANG Zheng,WU Shenghe,DUAN Dongping et al. Architecture characteristics of distributary channels in shallow water delta plain of the Huagang Formation in Xihu sag,East China Sea[J]. JOPC, 2024, 26(3): 525-544.

链接本文:

http://www.gdlxb.cn/CN/10.7605/gdlxb.2024.03.049 或 http://www.gdlxb.cn/CN/Y2024/V26/I3/525

[1] 陈琳琳,谢月芳. 1998. 东海西湖凹陷花港组沉积模式初探. 海洋石油, 18(4): 15-21.
[Chen L L,Xie Y F.1998. Discussion on depositional mode of Huagang Formation in Xihu trough,the East China Sea. Offshore Oil, 18(4): 15-21]
[2] 陈忠云,张建培,张涛,鲁法伟. 2013. 西湖凹陷层序划分及海平面变化响应. 海洋地质前沿, 29(9): 15-20.
[Chen Z Y,Zhang J P,Zhang T,Lu F W.2013. Stratigraphic sequences in Xihu sag and their reponse to sea level changes. Marine Geology Frontiers, 29(9): 15-20]
[3] 杜学斌,陆永潮,曹强,叶加仁,贾冀新,赵珂,段丹. 2020. 东海盆地西湖凹陷深部储层“相-岩-温”三元分级评价原则与效果. 地质科技通报, 39(3): 10-19.
[Du X B,Lu Y C,Cao Q,Ye J R,Jia J X,Zhao K,Duan D.2020. Grading evaluation of deep reservoir in Xihu Depression,East China Sea Basin. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 39(3): 10-19]
[4] 付晶,吴胜和,王哲,刘钰铭. 2015. 湖盆浅水三角洲分流河道储层构型模式: 以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘延长组野外露头为例. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 46(11): 4174-4182.
[Fu J,Wu S H,Wang Z,Liu Y M.2015. Architecture model of shallow-water delta distributary channel in lake basin: a case study of the Yanchang formation outcrops in the eastern margin of Ordos basin. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 46(11): 4174-4182]
[5] 葛海波. 2014. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷天外天—黄岩地区平湖—花港组层序地层及沉积相研究. 成都理工大学硕士学位论文.
[Ge H B.2014. The Study of Pinghu and Huagang Formation Sequence Stratigraphy and Sedimentation Facies Feature in Tianwaitian and Huangyan Region of Xihu Sag,East China Sea. Masteral dissertation of Chengdu University of Technology]
[6] 贺婷婷,李胜利,高兴军,宋岑,周新茂,贺东旭. 2014. 浅水湖泊三角洲平原分流河道类型与叠置模式. 古地理学报, 16(5): 597-604.
[He T T,Li S L,Gao X J,Song C,Zhou X M,He D X.2014. Types and superposed patterns of distributary channels in a shallow lacustrine delta plain. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 16(5): 597-604]
[7] 何贤科,娄敏,蔡华,李炳颖,刘英辉,黄鑫. 2023. 西湖凹陷C油田花港组浅水三角洲储集层构型. 新疆石油地质, 44(5): 517-527.
[He X K,Lou M,Cai H,Li B Y,Liu Y H,Huang X.2023. Architecture of shallow-water delta reservoir of Huagang Formation in C oilfield,Xihu Sag. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 44(5): 517-527]
[8] 胡明毅,柯岭,梁建设. 2010. 西湖凹陷花港组沉积相特征及相模式. 石油天然气学报, 32(5): 1-5.
[Hu M Y,Ke L,Liang J S.2010. The characteristics and pattern of sedimentary facies of Huagang Formation in Xihu depression. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 32(5): 1-5]
[9] 李上卿. 2000. 东海西湖凹陷新生代地质构造特征与演化. 海洋石油, 20(2): 8-14.
[Li S Q.2000. Cenozoic basin geological tectonic feature and evolution in Xihu Trough,the East China Sea. Offshore Oil, 20(2): 8-14]
[10] 李顺利,许磊,于兴河,侯国伟,胡勇,高照普. 2018. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷渐新世海侵作用与潮控体系沉积特征. 古地理学报, 20(6): 1023-1032.
[Li S L,Xu L,Yu X H,Hou G W,Hu Y,Gao Z P.2018. Marine transgressions and characteristics of the tide-dominated sedimentary systems in the Oligocene,Xihu sag,East China Sea Shelf Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 20(6): 1023-1032]
[11] 刘金水,廖宗廷,贾健谊,周祖翼,杨娟. 2003. 东海陆架盆地地质结构及构造演化. 上海地质, 24(3): 1-6.
[Liu J S,Liao Z T,Jia J Y,Zhou Z Y,Yang J.2003. The geological structure and tectonic evolution of the East China Sea Shelf Basin. Shanghai Geology, 24(3): 1-6]
[12] 刘金水,陆永潮,秦兰芝. 2019. 源-汇系统分析方法在大型储集体研究中的应用: 以西湖凹陷中央反转带花港组为例. 石油实验地质, 41(3): 303-310.
[Liu J S,Lu Y C,Qin L Z.2019. Application of source to sink system analysis in large reservoir research: a case study of Huagang Formation,Central Inversion Belt,Xihu Depression. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 41(3): 303-310]
[13] 娄敏,蔡华,何贤科,刘英辉,黄鑫,张宪国,刘华峰. 2023. 地震沉积学在东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷河流—三角洲相储集层刻画中的应用. 石油勘探与开发, 50(1): 125-138.
[Lou M,Cai H,He X K,Liu Y H,Huang X,Zhang X G,Liu H F.2023. Application of seismic sedimentology in characterization of fluvial-deltaic reservoirs in Xihu sag,East China Sea shelf basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 50(1): 125-138]
[14] 楼章华,兰翔,卢庆梅,蔡希源. 1999. 地形、气候与湖面波动对浅水三角洲沉积环境的控制作用: 以松辽盆地北部东区葡萄花油层为例. 地质学报, 73(1): 83-91.
[Lou Z H,Lan X,Lu Q M,Cai X Y.1999. Controls of the topography,climate and lake level fluctuation on the depositional environment of a ahallow-water delta: a case study of the Cretaceous putaohua reservoir in the northern part of Songliao Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 73(1): 83-91]
[15] 孙思敏,彭仕宓. 2006. 东海西湖凹陷平湖油气田花港组沉积相及沉积演化. 西北大学学报: 自然科学版,36(S1): 63-67.
[Sun S M,Peng S M.2006. Sedimentary facies and evolution of Huagang Formation of Pinghu oilfield in Xihu sag,the East China. Journal of Northwest University: Natural Science Edition,36(S1): 63-67]
[16] 王果寿,周卓明,肖朝辉,李美洲,周维奎,王琳. 2002. 西湖凹陷春晓区带下第三系平湖组、花港组沉积特征. 石油与天然气地质, 23(3): 257-261,265.
[Wang G S,Zhou Z M,Xiao C H,Li M Z,Zhou W K,Wang L.2002. Sedimentary characteristics of Eogene Pinghu Formation and Huagang Formation in Chunxiao zone of Xihu Lake depression. Oil & Gas Geology, 23(3): 257-261,265]
[17] 王文娟,张银国,张建培. 2014. 东海盆地西湖凹陷渐新统花港组地震相特征及沉积相分布. 海相油气地质, 19(1): 60-68.
[Wang W J,Zhang Y G,Zhang J P.2014. Seismic facies features and sedimentary facies distribution of Oligocene Huagang Formation in Xihu Sag,East China Sea Basin. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 19(1): 60-68]
[18] 王夏斌,姜在兴,胡光义,范廷恩,范洪军,何明薇,陈飞. 2020. 浅水三角洲分流河道沉积模式分类. 地球科学与环境学报, 42(5): 654-667.
[Wang X B,Jiang Z X,Hu G Y,Fan T E,Fan H J,He M W,Chen F.2020. Classification of sedimentary models of distributary channels in shallow-water deltas. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 42(5): 654-667]
[19] 魏恒飞,陈践发,张铜磊,李伟,刘娅昭,吴雪飞,王冠男. 2012. 西湖凹陷花港组层序地层划分和聚煤特征. 煤炭学报,37(S1): 149-156.
[Wei H F,Chen J F,Zhang T L,Li W,Liu Y Z,Wu X F,Wang G N.2012. Sequence stratigraphic division and concentrating coal characteristics of Huagang Formation in Xihu depression. Journal of China Coal Society,37(S1): 149-156]
[20] 武法东,陆永潮,陈平,周平. 1997. 东海西湖凹陷渐新统花港组海绿石的发现及其意义. 沉积学报, 15(3): 158-161.
[Wu F D,Lu Y C,Chen P,Zhou P.1997. The discovery and significance of glauconites in the Huagang Formation of the Oligocene,Xihu depression,East China Sea. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 15(3): 158-161]
[21] 吴胜和,纪友亮,岳大力,印森林. 2013. 碎屑沉积地质体构型分级方案探讨. 高校地质学报, 19(1): 12-22.
[Wu S H,Ji Y L,Yue D L,Yin S L.2013. Discussion on Hierarchical Scheme of Architectural Units in Clastic Deposits. Geological Journal of China Universities, 19(1): 12-22]
[22] 吴胜和,徐振华,刘钊. 2019. 河控浅水三角洲沉积构型. 古地理学报, 21(2): 18-31.
[Wu S H,Xu Z H,Liu Z.2019. Depositional architecture of fluvial-dominated shoal water delta. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 21(2): 18-31]
[23] 许薇龄,乐俊英. 1988. 东海的构造运动及演化. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 8(1): 9-21.
[Xu W L,Le J Y.1988. Tectonic movement and evolution of the East China Sea. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 8(1): 9-21]
[24] 徐振华,吴胜和,刘钊,赵军寿,耿红柳,吴峻川,张天佑,刘照玮. 2019. 浅水三角洲前缘指状砂坝构型特征: 以渤海湾盆地渤海BZ25油田新近系明化镇组下段为例. 石油勘探与开发, 46(2): 322-333.
[Xu Z H,Wu S H,Liu Z,Zhao J S,Geng H L,Wu J C,Zhang T Y,Liu Z W.2019. Sandbody architecture of the bar finger within shoal water delta front: insights from the Lower Member of Minghuazhen Formation,Neogene,Bohai BZ25 Oilfield,Bohai Bay Basin,East China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 46(2): 322-333]
[25] 于兴河,李顺利,曹冰,侯国伟,王亚风,皇甫志远. 2017. 西湖凹陷渐新世层序地层格架与沉积充填响应. 沉积学报, 35(2): 299-314.
[Yu X H,Li S L,Cao B,Hou G W,Wang Y F,Huangfu Z Y.2017. Oligocene sequence framework and depositional response in the Xihu Depression,East China Sea Shelf Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 35(2): 299-314]
[26] 曾灿,尹太举,宋亚开. 2017. 湖平面升降对浅水三角洲影响的沉积数值模拟实验. 地球科学, 42(11): 2095-2104.
[Zeng C,Yin T J,Song Y K.2017. Experimental on numerical simulation of the impact of lake level plane fluctuation on shallow water delta. Earth Science, 42(11): 2095-2104]
[27] 张国华,张建培. 2015. 东海陆架盆地构造反转特征及成因机制探讨. 地学前缘, 22(1): 260-270.
[Zhang G H,Zhang J P.2015. A discussion on the tectonic inversion and its genetic mechanism in the East China Sea Shelf Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 22(1): 260-270]
[28] 张国华,刘金水,秦兰芝,赵洪. 2018. 西湖凹陷渐新统花港组大型辫状河沉积体系特征. 中国海上油气, 30(3): 10-18.
[Zhang G H,Liu J S,Qin L Z,Zhao H.2018. Characteristics of the large braided river depositional system of the Oligocene Huagang Formation in the Xihu sag. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 30(3): 10-18]
[29] 张建培,张涛,刘景彦,戴林,李键,漆滨汶. 2008. 西湖凹陷反转构造分布与样式. 海洋石油, 28(4): 14-20.
[Zhang J P,Zhang T,Liu J Y,Dai L,Li J,Qi B W.2008. Distribution and style of inversed structures in Xihu Depression. Offshore Oil, 28(4): 14-20]
[30] 张建培,徐发,钟韬,张田,余逸凡. 2012. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖组—花港组层序地层模式及沉积演化. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 32(1): 35-41.
[Zhang J P,Xu F,Zhong T,Zhang T,Yu Y F.2012. Sequence stratigraphic models and sedimentary evolution of Pinghu and Huagang Formations in Xihu Trough. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 32(1): 35-41]
[31] 张绍亮,秦兰芝,余逸凡,唐贤君. 2014. 西湖凹陷渐新统花港组下段沉积相特征及模式. 石油地质与工程, 28(2): 5-8.
[Zhang S L,Qin L Z,Yu Y F,Tang X J.2014. Sedimentary facies characteristics and its mode of lower member of Oligocene Huagang Formation in Xihu sag. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 28(2): 5-8]
[32] 赵金海. 2004. 东海中、新生代盆地成因机制和演化(上). 海洋石油, 24(4): 6-14.
[Zhao J H.2004. The forming factors and evolution of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic basin in the East China Sea. Offshore Oil, 24(4): 6-14]
[33] 赵志刚,王鹏,祁鹏,郭瑞. 2016. 东海盆地形成的区域地质背景与构造演化特征. 地球科学, 41(3): 546-554.
[Zhao Z G,Wang P,Qi P,Guo R.2016. Regional background and tectonic evolution of East China Sea Basin. Earth Science, 41(3): 546-554]
[34] 郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容. 2001. 陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义. 沉积学报, 19(2): 249-255.
[Zheng R C,Peng J,Wu Z R.2001. Grade division of base-level cycles of terrigenous basin and its implications. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 19(2): 249-255]
[35] 周瑞琦,傅恒,徐国胜,苗清,付振群. 2018. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖组—花港组沉积层序. 沉积学报, 36(1): 132-141.
[Zhou R Q,Fu H,Xu G S,Miao Q,Fu Z Q.2018. Eocene Pinghu Formation-Oligocene Huagang Formation sequence stratigraphy and depositional model of Xihu Sag in East China Sea Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 36(1): 132-141]
[36] 朱毅秀,黄导武,王欢,何贤科,师源,佘亚明. 2019. 东海西湖凹陷A气田渐新统花港组三段厚层砂岩沉积环境. 石油与天然气地质, 40(6): 1226-1235.
[Zhu Y X,Huang D W,Wang H,He X K,Shi Y,She Y M.2019 Sedimentary setting of thick sandstone in the 3rd member of the Oligocene Huagang Formation in A gas field in the Xihu Sag,East China Sea Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 40(6): 1226-1235]
[37] Chen D Z,Wang J G,Qing H R,Yan D,Li R W.2009. Hydrothermal venting activities in the Early Cambrian,South China: petrological,geochronological and stable isotopic constraints. Chemical Geology, 258: 168-181.
[38] Rust B R.1978. A classification of alluvial channel systems. In: Miall A D(ed). Fluvial Sedimentology. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 5: 187-198.
[39] Zeng H L,Backus M M.2005. Interpretive advantages of 90°-phase wavelets(Part 1): modeling. Geophysics, 70(3): C7-C15.
[40] Zeng H L,Backus M M,Barrow K T,Tyler N.1998. Stratal slicing(Part I): realistic 3-D seismic model. Geophysics, 63(2): 502-513.
[41] Zhang L,Bao Z D,Dou L X,Zang D S,Mao S W,Song J,Zhao J H,Wang Z C.2018. Sedimentary characteristics and pattern of distributary channels in shallow water deltaic red bed succession: a case from the Late Cretaceous Yaojia Formation,southern Songliao Basin,NE China. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 171: 1171-1190.