Journal of Palaeogeography
 
 Home  |  About JOP  |  Editorial Committee  |  Subscription  |  Message  |  Meetings  |  Call for Papers  |  Contact
Journal of Palaeogeography
For Reviewer
  Review Policy
  Reviewer Login
  EC Member Login
  Editorial Office Login
  Editor-in-Chief Login
  Online First
  Current Issue
  Archive
  Advanced Search
  Most Read
  Most Download
  Free Email Alert
  RSS
  Current Issue
 
2012 Vol.  1 No.  2
Published: 2012-10-25

Palaeogeography
Lithofacies palaeogeography and sedimentology
Tectonopalaeogeography and palaeotectonics
Marine sedimentology
Palaeogeography
91 Palaeogeography of China
Feng Zengzhao, Zheng Xiujuan, Jin Zhenkui
Palaeogeography is a science that studies the features and evolution of physical geography in geological history and human history. The palaeogeography of China has multiple disciplines and multiple types of palaeogeographic map. These perfectly reflect “a hundred flowers blossom and a hundred schools of thought content”. The palaeogeography of China has three characteristics. The first is multiple disciplines flourishing simultaneously. The second is that lithofacies palaeogeography is in a leading position. The third is that palaeogeography of China is closely connected with industrial practice. It is why palaeogeography, especially lithofacies palaeogeography of China, can flourish continually. We have two journals of palaeogeography, i. e. Journal of Palaeogeography (Chinese Edition) and Journal of Palaeogeography (English Edition). The former primarily publishes articles of Chinese authors regarding Chinese palaeogeography and related disciplines and has a foothold in China. The latter will publish the articles of both Chinese and international authors and caters to foreign readers. These two journals will cooperate together and display their own expertise, which will effectively make a great contribution to the development and innovation of Chinese palaeogeography and international palaeogeography
2012 Vol. 1 (2): 91-104 [Abstract] ( 4531 ) [HTML 1KB] PDF (1164 KB)   ( 643 )
105 Quaternary marine transgressions in eastern China
Lin Jingxing, Dai Luping

Based on the data from 117 holes (9151 samples) and the research on ecology and palaeoecology of Foraminifera combined with that on Ostracoda, diatoms, pollen and spores, eight marine transgressions have been recognized in the great plain regions through the Quaternary sequences and two marine transgressions have been found since the Late Pleistocene in the coastal plain (bedrock coast) areas. In the North China Plain, these are in ascending order: the Bohai transgression in the Early Pleistocene, the Haixing and Huanghua transgressions in the Middle Pleistocene, the Baiyangdian and Cangzhou transgressions in the Late Pleistocene, and the Tianjin transgression in the Holocene. In the Yangtze River Delta region the Rugao and Zhoupu transgressions occurred in the Early Pleistocene, the Shanghai, Jiading, and Wangdian transgressions in the Middle Pleistocene, the Jiangyin and Ge Hu transgressions in the Late Pleistocene, and the Zhenjiang transgression in the Holocene. In the coastal plain (bedrock coast) areas of North China, the Cangzhou transgression was recorded in the Late Pleistocene and the Tianjin transgression in the Holocene, whereas in South China the Fuzhou transgression took place in the Late Pleistocene and the Changle transgression in the Holocene. The transgressions correspond to warm periods and regressions to cold periods. The younger transgressions were not only of shorter duration, but also of larger magnitude. These findings point to the existence of four flood event strata since the Middle Pleistocene: two in the late Middle Pleistocene and another two in the Late Pleistocene.

2012 Vol. 1 (2): 105-125 [Abstract] ( 2784 ) [HTML 1KB] PDF (115 KB)   ( 535 )
Lithofacies palaeogeography and sedimentology
126 Integrated borehole and outcrop study for documentation of sea level cycles within the Early Eocene Naredi Formation, western Kutch, India
Urbashi Sarkar, Santanu Banerjee, P. K. Saraswati
A combined micropalaeontological and sedimentological investigation of the Early Eocene Naredi Formation (thickness varying between 20 m and 60 m) reveals a complete third-order cycle and six fourth-order sea level cycles. Within the third-order cycle the foraminiferal abundance and diversity gradually increase upwards and reach their maximum values at about 41 m thickness above the base of the formation and subsequently decrease upward and finally give way upward to an unfossiliferous zone at the topmost part. Within a fourth-order cycle foraminiferal abundance and diversity exhibit a similar increasing and decreasing pattern. Bounded between two unconformities the Naredi Formation represents a sequence. A highly fossiliferous Assilina-bearing limestone interval represents the maximum flooding zone which separates the transgressive systems tract at the base from the highstand systems tract at the top.
2012 Vol. 1 (2): 126-137 [Abstract] ( 3088 ) [HTML 1KB] PDF (4281 KB)   ( 595 )
Biopalaeogeography and palaeoclimatology
138 Were sauropod dinosaurs responsible for the warm Mesozoic climate?
A. J. (Tom) van Loon
It was recently postulated that methane production by the giant Mesozoic sauropod dinosaurs was larger than the present-day release of this greenhouse gas by nature and man-induced activities jointly, thus contributing to the warm Mesozoic climate. This conclusion was reached by correct calculations, but these calculations were based on unrealistic assumptions: the researchers who postulated this dinosaur-induced warm climate did take into account neither the biomass production required for the sauropods’ food, nor the constraints for the habitats in which the dinosaurs lived, thus neglecting the palaeogeographic conditions. This underlines the importance of palaeogeography for a good understanding of the Earth’s geological history.
2012 Vol. 1 (2): 138-148 [Abstract] ( 3264 ) [HTML 1KB] PDF (10455 KB)   ( 513 )
Tectonopalaeogeography and palaeotectonics
149 Restoration of eroded stratal thickness in key periods of tectonic change in a multi-stage superimposed Tarim Basin in China
Liu Hao, Wang Yingmin
With an area of 56×104 km2, the Tarim Basin is the largest inland basin in China and is also generally acknowledged as one of the most important areas for potential oil and gas exploration. On the basis of data from 22 regional seismic profiles and 40 drilling wells, 15 important first-order and second-order regional unconformities were defined. Almost all the main unconformities are superimposed unconfomities. Since the Cambrian, 5 key periods of tectonic change have occurred during the evolution of the Tarim Basin. The total eroded stratal thickness of the above-mentioned unconformities was calculated by using the method of virtual extrapolation of seismic reflection. The results indicate that the total eroded stratal thickness of different periods is quite different in different locations of the basin. Taking the Upper-Middle Ordovician as an example, its thickness restoration of eroded strata was calculated into individual stages i.e. its thickness restoration of eroded strata was calculated to different tectonic periods. Otherwise, as for the specific period of tectonic change, the underlying strata were, respectively eroded and thus the thickness restoration of eroded strata was calculated into individual intervals. Taking the Early Hercynian period as an example, the eroded stratal thickness was calculated into individual intervals to calculate the ratio of intervals of various ages occupying the total eroded thickness. The results show that for the same stratum, its degree of erosion is quite different in different periods and at different locations, due to the varying influence of tectonic movement. The unconformities of some key periods of tectonic change have different controls on the degree of erosion and the eroded range of the individual period of the underlying strata which are the typical characteristics of multi-stage superimposition of unconformities in the Tarim Basin.
2012 Vol. 1 (2): 149-171 [Abstract] ( 2924 ) [HTML 1KB] PDF (14609 KB)   ( 466 )
Marine sedimentology
172 Measuring and modeling suspended sediment concentration profiles in the surf zone
Ping Wang
Time-averaged suspended sediment concentration profiles across the surfzone were measured in a large-scale three-dimensional movable bed laboratory facility (LSTF: Large-scale Sediment Transport Facility). Sediment suspension under two different types of breaking waves, spilling and plunging breakers, was investigated. The magnitudes and shapes of the concentration profiles varied substantially at different locations across the surf zone, reflecting the different intensities of breaking-induced turbulence. Sediment suspension at the energetic plunging breaker-line was much more active, resulting in nearly homogeneous concentration profiles throughout most of the water column, as compared to the reminder of the surf zone and at the spilling breaker-line. Four suspended sediment concentration models were examined based on the LSTF data, including the mixing turbulence length approach, segment eddy viscosity model, breaking-induced wave-energy dissipation approach, and a combined breaking and turbulence length model developed by this study. Neglecting the breaking-induced turbulence and subsequent sediment mixing, suspended sediment concentration models failed to predict the across-shore variations of the sediment suspension, especially at the plunging breaker-line. Wave-energy dissipation rate provided an accurate method for estimating the intensity of turbulence generated by wave breaking. By incorporating the breaking-induced turbulence, the combined breaking and turbulence length model reproduced the across-shore variation of sediment suspension in the surf zone. The combined model reproduced the measured time-averaged suspended sediment concentration profiles reasonably well across the surf zone.
2012 Vol. 1 (2): 172-193 [Abstract] ( 2491 ) [HTML 1KB] PDF (5741 KB)   ( 440 )
Copyright © 2014 JOURNAL OF PALAEOGEOGRAPHY
Editorial Office of Journal of Palaeogeography, 20 Xueyuan Road, P. O. Box 902, Beijing 100083, China
Tel: +86-10-62394320; +86–10–62396149     Email: Jpalaeo2012@163.com