Abstract The Anthropocene is regarded as a unique geological era dominated by humans. Over more than 20 years since the concept was proposed,the Anthropocene has not only been increasingly used within the Earth Science,but also rapidly adopted by many disciplinaries such as society and humanities. This paper aims to review the Anthropocene,regarding the similarities,differences and interrelationships in understanding the Anthropocene among the disciplinaries,from three perspectives of Earth System Science, Geology and Humanities. It has been suggested that the 1950s was the beginning of the Anthropocene, when was called the Great Acceleration of human activities that has changed the Earth System dramatically. The Anthropocene from an Earth System Science perspective focuses on the new Earth System state driven by humans. The Anthropocene from a geological perspective focuses on the geological signals in the strata indicating the start of a new geological era. The Anthropocene from a social and humanistic perspective focuses on human responsibility to cope with the global environment crises by industrial civilization and to make a hopeful promise to the human future. No matter the Anthropocene to be into the geochronological system,it will be an issue focused by the Earth Science and the Social Sciences in the long-term future.
Fund:Financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the Research Funds of Renmin University of China(No.20XNL011)
About author: About the author FANG Xiuqi,born in 1962,is a professor in Beijing Normal University. He is mainly engaged in research on environment change. E-mail: xfang@bnu.edu.cn.
Cite this article:
FANG Xiuqi. On perspectives of the Anthropocene[J]. JOPC, 2024, 26(6): 1287-1304.
FANG Xiuqi. On perspectives of the Anthropocene[J]. JOPC, 2024, 26(6): 1287-1304.
[1] 陈之荣. 2006. 人类圈·智慧圈·人类世. 第四纪研究,26(5): 872-878. [Chen Z R.2006. Anthroposphere·Noösphere·Anthropocene. Quaternary Sciences, 26(5): 872-878] [2] 高抒. 2019. 人类世开启地质演化新时期. 世界科学,(9): 1. [Gao S.2019. Anthropocene ushers in a new era of geological evolution. World Science,(9): 1] [3] 胡志红,王洵. 2023. 气候小说: 缘起、界定、类型及面临的挑战. 社会科学战线,(7): 165-173. [Hu Z H,Wang X.2023. Climate fictions: origin,definition,genre and challenges. Social Science Front,(7): 165-173] [4] 江泽淳. 2003. “思路正确是最关键的”: 诺贝尔奖得主保罗·克鲁岑访谈录. 世界科学,(9): 8-10. [Jiang Z C.2003. “Correct thinking is the most crucial”: interview with Nobel laureate Paul Crutzen. World Science,(9): 8-10] [5] 姜礼福. 2020. “人类世”概念考辨: 从地质学到人文社会科学的话语建构. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 20(2): 124-134. [Jiang L F.2020. Exploration of the concept of the Anthropocene: discursive construction from geology to humanities and social sciences. Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition), 20(2): 124-134] [6] 姜礼福. 2023. 人类世、气候小说及环境人文新趋势: 斯洛维克教授访谈录. 外国文学,(2): 172-180. [Jiang L F.2023. The Anthropocene,climate fiction and new trends in environmental humanities: an interview with professor Scott Slovic. Foreign Literature,(2): 172-180] [7] 姜礼福,孟庆粉. 2018. 人类世: 从地质概念到文学批评. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 21(6): 44-51. [Jiang L F,Meng Q F.2018. Anthropocene: a term from geology to literary criticism. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition), 21(6): 44-51] [8] 蒋青,冷琴,王力. 2009. “人类世”论评: 环境领域的“舶来品”,地球科学的新纪元?地层学杂志, 33(1): 11-17. [Jiang Q,Leng Q,Wang L.2009. Anthropocene,the newly proposed geological epoch rooted in environmental research. Journal of Stratigraphy, 33(1): 11-17] [9] 刘东生. 2004. 开展“人类世”环境研究,做新时代地学的开拓者: 纪念黄汲清先生的地学创新精神. 第四纪研究,24(4): 369-378. [Liu D S.2004. Demand of Anthropocene study in the new stage of geoscience: in honor of late geologist Huang Jiqing for his innovative spirit. Quaternary Sciences,24(4): 369-378] [10] 刘魁,罗民杰. 2023. “人类世”与“资本世”之争的演变趋向及其现代化审视. 南京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 36(3): 1-11. [Liu K,Luo M J.2023. The evolution trend over the “Anthropocene-Capitalocene” debate and its modernization inspection. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences), 36(3): 1-11] [11] 刘学,张志强,郑军卫,赵纪东,王立伟. 2014. 关于人类世问题研究的讨论. 地球科学进展, 29(5): 640-649. [Liu X,Zhang Z Q,Zheng J W,Zhao J D,Wang L W.2014. Discussion on the Anthropocene research. Advances in Earth Science, 29(5): 640-649] [12] 刘颖,刘魁. 2023. “人类世”可受掌控吗: 对现代化方案的一种思考. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),24(1): 13-20. [Liu Y,Liu K.2023. “Can the Anthropocene be controlled”: a reflection on modernization plans. Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition),24(1): 13-20] [13] 孟庆粉. 2023. 何以为家: 论《最后通牒》中的人类世气候风险和共同体书写. 广东外语外贸大学学报, 34(3): 113-121. [Meng Q F.2023. Nowhere is “Home": on climate risk and community writing in ultimatum. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 34(3): 113-121] [14] 唐兴华,胡翌霖. 2022. 在“人类世”中重建环境伦理何以可能?从拉图尔的盖娅思想看. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 24(2): 7-14. [Tang X H,Hu Y L.2022. Possibility of rebuilding environmental ethics in the “Anthropocene”: based on Latour's interpretation of the Gaia Hypothesis. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 24(2): 7-14] [15] 许林玉. 2021. 保罗·克鲁岑(1933—2021). 世界科学,(10): 64. [Xu L Y.2021. Paul Crutzen(1933—2021). World Science,(10): 64] [16] 杨梅,朱新福. 2020. 《水刀子》中的反乌托邦城市书写和人类世想象. 当代外国文学, 41(4): 20-27. [Yang M,Zhu X F.2020. The dystopian urban writing and the Anthropocene imagination in The Water Knife. Contemporary Foreign Literature, 41(4): 20-27] [17] 尹志勇,刘晓东. 2023. “人类世”的提出与争议. 第四纪研究, 43(4): 1146-1156. [Yin Z Y,Liu X D.2023. “The Anthropocene”: its proposition and controversies. Quaternary Sciences, 43(4): 1146-1156] [18] 约翰·麦克尼尔,徐露,李星皓. 2022. “人新世”和大加速(1780—2021). 国际社会科学杂志(中文版), 39(2): 62-69. [McNeill J R,Xu L,Li X H.2022. The Anthropocene and the Great Acceleration,1780-2021. International Social Science Journal(Chinese Edition), 39(2): 62-69] [19] 张兰生,方修琦,任国玉. 2017. 全球变化(第二版). 北京: 高等教育出版社. [Zhang L S,Fang X Q,Ren G Y.2017. Global Change(second edition). Beijing: Higher Education Press] [20] 张旭鹏. 2019. “人类世”与后人类的历史观. 史学集刊,(1): 46-51. [Zhang X P.2019. Anthropocene and the new posthuman view of history. Collected Papers of History Studies,(1): 46-51] [21] 张振. 2022. 西方生态批评的第三波浪潮: 人类世话语及局限. 中国高校社会科学,(3): 147-156. [Zhang Z.2022. The third wave of the ecocriticism: discourses of the Anthropocene and its limits. Social Sciences in Chinese Higher Education Institutions,(3): 147-156] [22] 张作成. 2023. 当代西方历史理论中的“人类世”话语阐释. 史学理论研究,(4): 122-133. [Zhang Z C.2023. Interpreting Anthropocene in contemporary historical theoretical discourse in the West. Historiography Bimonthly,(4): 122-133] [23] 周卫健,赵雪,陈宁. 2024. 中国人类世科学研究新进展. 地球科学进展, 39(1): 1-11. [Zhou W J,Zhao X,Chen N.2024. New progress in the Anthropocene science in China. Advances in Earth Science, 39(1): 1-11] [24] Chakrabarty D.2009. The climate of history: four theses. Critical inquiry, 35(2): 197-222. [25] Cooper A H,Brown T J,Price S J,Ford J R,Waters C N.2018. Humans are the most significant global geomorphological driving force of the 21st century. The Anthropocene Review, 5(3): 222-229. [26] Crutzen P J.2002. Geology of mankind. Nature, 415(6867): 23. [27] Crutzen P J,Stoermer E F.2000. The “Anthropocene”. Global Change Newsletter, 41: 17-18. [28] Edgeworth M,Ellis E C,Gibbard P,Neal C,Ellis M.2019. The chronostratigraphic method is unsuitable for determining the start of the Anthropocene. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 43(3): 334-344. [29] Elhacham E,Ben-Uri L,Grozovski J,Bar-On Y M,Milo R.2020. Global human-made mass exceeds all living biomass. Nature, 588(7838): 442-444. [30] Ganopolski A,Winkelmann R,Schellnhuber H J.2016. Critical insolation-CO2 relation for diagnosing past and future glacial inception. Nature, 529(7585): 200-203. [31] Gibbard P L,Bauer A M,Edgeworth M,Ruddiman W F,Gill J L,Merritts D J,Finney S C,Edwards L E,Walker M J C,Maslin M,Ellis E C.2021. A practical solution: the Anthropocene is a geological event,not a formal epoch. Episodes Journal of International Geoscience, 45(4): 349-357. [32] Hamilton C.2017. Defiant Earth: The Fate of Humans in The Anthropocene. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons. [33] Haraway D.2015. Anthropocene,capitalocene,plantationocene,chthulucene: making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6(1): 159-165. [34] Head M J,Steffen W,Fagerlind D,Waters C N,Poirier C,Syvitski J,Zalasiewicz J A,Barnosky A D,Cearreta A,Jeandel C,Leinfelder R,Mcneill J R,Rose N L,Summerhayes C,Wagreich M,Zinke J.2021. The great acceleration is real and provides a quantitative basis for the proposed Anthropocene Series/Epoch. International Union of Geological Sciences, 45(4): 359-376. [35] Head M J,Zalasiewicz J A,Waters C N,Turner S D,Williams M,Barnosky A D,Steffen W,Wagreich M,Haff P K,Syvitski J,Leinfelder R,Mccarthy F M G,Rose N L,Wing S L,An Z,Cearreta A,Cundy A B,Fairchild I J,Han Y,Ivar Do Sul J A,Jeandel C,Mcneill J R,Summerhayes C P.2022. The proposed Anthropocene Epoch/Series is underpinned by an extensive array of mid-20th century stratigraphic event signals. Journal of Quaternary Science, 37(7): 1181-1187. [36] Head M J,Zalasiewicz J A,Waters C N,Turner S D,Williams M,Barnosky A D,Steffen W,Wagreich M,Haff P K,Syvitski J,Others.2023. The Anthropocene is a prospective epoch/series,not a geological event. Episodes Journal of International Geoscience, 46(2): 229-238. [37] Hibbard K A,Crutzen P J,Lambin E F,Liverman D,Mantua N J,McNeill J R,Messerli B,Steffen W.2006. Decadal interactions of humans and the environment. In: Costanza R,Graumlich L,Steffen W(eds). Integrated history and future of people on earth. Dahlem workshop report 96. Boston,MA: MIT Press: 341-375. [38] IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2021. Working Group I Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report(AR6),Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers. IPCC,Switzerland,31. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM_final.pdf. [39] Koster E.2023. Public-minded reflections from the Anthropocene Working Group meeting in Germany. Episodes Journal of International Geoscience, 46(2): 317-324. [40] Lewis S L,Maslin M A.2015. Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519(7542): 171-180. [41] Lewis S L,Maslin M A.2018. The Human Planet: How We Created the Anthropocene. New Haven,Connecticut: Yale University Press. [42] Moore J W.2016. Anthropocene or capitalocene?Nature,History,And the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland,California: PM Press. [43] Perkins S.2023. Researchers move closer to defining the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 120(29). [44] Prillaman M.2023. Are we in the Anthropocene?Geologists could define new epoch for Earth. Nature, 613(7942): 14-15. [45] Revkin A.2016. An Anthropocene journey. Anthropocene Magazine: 62-75. [46] Richardson K,Steffen W,Lucht W,Bendtsen J,Cornell S E,Donges J F,Drüke M,Fetzer I,Bala G,von Bloh W,Feulner G,Fiedler S,Gerten D,Gleeson T,Hofmann M,Huiskamp W,Kummu M,Mohan C,Nogués-Bravo D,Petri S,Porkka M,Rahmstorf S,Schaphoff S,Thonicke K,Tobian A,Virkki V,Wang-Erlandsson L,Weber L,Rockström J.2023. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances, 9(37): eadh2458. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh2458. [47] Robin L,Steffen W.2007. History for the Anthropocene. History Compass, 5(5): 1694-1719. [48] Rockström J,Steffen W,Noone K,Persson Å,Chapin F S,Lambin E F,Lenton T M,Scheffer M,Folke C,Schellnhuber H J.2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263): 472-475. [49] Ruddiman W F.2003. The Anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago. Climatic Change, 61(3): 261-293. [50] Ruddiman W F.2013. The Anthropocene. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 41(1): 45-68. [51] SQS. 2009. International Commission on Stratigraphy,Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy(SQS),Annual Report 2009. http://quaternary.stratigraphy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/SQSAnnual-report09.doc. [52] Steffen W.2021. Introducing the Anthropocene: the human epoch. This article belongs to Ambio's 50th anniversary collection. Theme: Anthropocene. Ambio, 50(10): 1784-1787. [53] Steffen W,Sanderson R A,Tyson P D,Jäger J,Matson P A,Moore Iii B,Oldfield F,Richardson K,Schellnhuber H,Turner B L.2004. Global change and the earth system: a planet under pressure. Springer Science & Business Media. [54] Steffen W,Crutzen P J,Mcneill J R,Others.2007. The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. Ambio-Journal of Human Environment Research and Management, 36(8): 614-621. [55] Steffen W,Grinevald J,Crutzen P,Mcneill J.2011. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical,Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938): 842-867. [56] Steffen W,Broadgate W,Deutsch L,Gaffney O,Ludwig C.2015. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1): 81-98. [57] Steffen W,Leinfelder R,Zalasiewicz J,Waters C N,Williams M,Summerhayes C,Barnosky A D,Cearreta A,Crutzen P,Edgeworth M,Ellis E C,Fairchild I J,Galuszka A,Grinevald J,Haywood A,Ivar Do Sul J,Jeandel C,Mcneill J R,Odada E,Oreskes N,Revkin A,Richter D D,Syvitski J,Vidas D,Wagreich M,Wing S L,Wolfe A P,Schellnhuber H J.2016. Stratigraphic and Earth System approaches to defining the Anthropocene. Earth's Future, 4(8): 324-345. [58] Steffen W,Rockström J,Richardson K,Lenton T M,Folke C,Liverman D,Summerhayes C P,Barnosky A D,Cornell S E,Crucifix M.2018. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33): 8252-8259. [59] Steffen W,Richardson K,Rockström J,Schellnhuber H J,Dube O P,Dutreuil S,Lenton T M,Lubchenco J.2020. The emergence and evolution of Earth System Science. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(1): 54-63. [60] Syvitski J,Waters C N,Day J,Milliman J D,Summerhayes C,Steffen W,Zalasiewicz J,Cearreta A,Ga L Uszka A,Hajdas I,Others.2020. Extraordinary human energy consumption and resultant geological impacts beginning around 1950 CE initiated the proposed Anthropocene Epoch. Communications Earth & Environment, 1(1): 32. [61] UNDP(United Nations Development Programme). 2020. Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2020. [62] Voosen P.2023. Anthropocene's emblem may be Canadian pond. Science, 381(6654): 114-115. [63] Waters C N,Zalasiewicz J,Summerhayes C,Barnosky A D,Poirier C,Galuszka A,Cearreta A,Edgeworth M,Ellis E C,Ellis M,Jeandel C,Leinfelder R,Mcneill J R,Richter D D,Steffen W,Syvitski J,Vidas D,Wagreich M,Williams M,Zhisheng A,Grinevald J,Odada E,Oreskes N,Wolfe A P.2016. The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science, 351(6269): aad2622. doi: 10.1126/science.aad2622. [64] Waters C N,Zalasiewicz J,Summerhayes C,Fairchild I J,Rose N L,Loader N J,Shotyk W,Cearreta A,Head M J,Syvitski J P M,Williams M,Wagreich M,Barnosky A D,An Z,Leinfelder R,Jeandel C,Galuszka A,Ivar Do Sul J A,Gradstein F,Steffen W,Mcneill J R,Wing S,Poirier C,Edgeworth M.2018. Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point(GSSP)for the Anthropocene Series: where and how to look for potential candidates. Earth-Science Reviews, 178: 379-429. [65] Waters C N,Turner S D.2022. Defining the onset of the Anthropocene. Science, 378(6621): 706-708. [66] Waters C N,Head M J,Zalasiewicz J,Mccarthy F M G,Wing S L,Haff P K,Williams M,Barnosky A D,Fialkiewicz-Koziel B,Leinfelder R,Mcneill J R,Rose N L,Steffen W,Summerhayes C P,Wagreich M,An Z,Cearreta A,Cundy A B,Fairchild I J,Galuszka A,Hajdas I,Han Y,Ivar Do Sul J A,Jeandel C,Syvitski J,Turner S D,Zinke J.2023. Response to Merritts et al.(2023): The Anthropocene is complex. Defining it is not. Earth-Science Reviews, 238: 104335. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104335. [67] Witze A.2023. This quiet lake could mark the start of a new Anthropocene epoch. Nature, 619(7970): 441-442. [68] Witze A.2024. It's final: the Anthropocene is not an epoch,despite protest over vote. Nature: doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00868-1. [69] Zalasiewicz J,Waters C N,Summerhayes C P,Wolfe A P,Barnosky A D,Cearreta A,Crutzen P,Ellis E,Fairchild I J,Galuszka A,Haff P,Hajdas I,Head M J,Ivar Do Sul J A,Jeandel C,Leinfelder R,Mcneill J R,Neal C,Odada E,Oreskes N,Steffen W,Syvitski J,Vidas D,Wagreich M,Williams M.2017. The working group on the Anthropocene: summary of evidence and interim recommendations. Anthropocene, 19: 55-60. [70] Zalasiewicz J,Waters C N,Williams M,Summerhayes C P.2019. The Anthropocene As a Geological Time Unit: A Guide to the Scientific Evidence and Current Debate. Cambridge,U.K: Cambridge University Press,361. [71] Zalasiewicz J,Waters C N,Ellis E C,Head M J,Vidas D,Steffen W,Thomas J A,Horn E,Summerhayes C P,Leinfelder R,Mcneill J R,Galuszka A,Williams M,Barnosky A D,Richter D D B,Gibbard P L,Syvitski J,Jeandel C,Cearreta A,Cundy A B,Fairchild I J,Rose N L,Ivar Do Sul J A,Shotyk W,Turner S,Wagreich M,Zinke J.2021. The Anthropocene: comparing its meaning in geology(Chronostratigraphy)with conceptual approaches arising in other disciplines. Earth's Future, 9(3): e2020EF001896. doi: 10.1029/2020ef001896. [72] 齋藤文紀. 2022. 地質年代区分の国際基準(GSSP)と人新世. 学術の動向, 11: 78-81. [73] 立川雅司. 2019. 分野别研究動向: 人新世概念が社会学にもたらすもの. 社会学評論, 70(2): 146-160.