Shale type division and logging identification in the Member 1 of Luzhai Formation,Lower Carboniferous,Guizhong Depression
HUANG Yuyue1,2, WANG Guiwen1,2, KUANG Lichun1,2, QIN Yinglun1,2,3, WANG Song1,2, DANG Wenle1,2, ZHUO Seqiang3, BI Shaochen1,2, LAI Jin1,2
1 National Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering,China University of Petroleum(Beijing),Beijing 102249,China; 2 College of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum(Beijing),Beijing 102249,China; 3 China Guangxi Investment Group Energy Group Co.,LTD,Nanning 530000,China
Abstract The shale gas of Luzhai Formation in Liucheng North block of Guizhong Depression has made a breakthrough and is expected to become a replacement field for marine shale gas outside Sichuan Basin. However,it is difficult to identify shale type and evaluate reservoir due to the formation heterogeneity and frequent transverse and horizontal phase transformation. In this paper,a shale type division scheme based on “mineral composition+TOC content”is established. Logging identification and prediction of shale composition and TOC content are realized by using elite-mineral conversion optimization equation and BP neural network model,respectively. The shale layers are identified and characterized by two methods: image log dynamic slice and button electrode apparent conductivity image. By elaborating the stratification degree and gas bearing characteristics of different lithofacies types,the favorable shale types and distribution characteristics in the study area are described. The results show that five typical shale types are developed in the Member 1 of Luzhai Formation. Controlled by sedimentary palaeoenvironment,the shale distribution in the study area shows strong vertical heterogeneity. The Member 1 of Luzhai Formation is located in the lower slope sedimentary environment as a whole,and the sedimentary water in the vertical layer(①~⑦)gradually becomes shallower,the content of gray matter decreases while the supply of terrigenous debris increases,and the total organic carbon content also gradually decreases. The shale type gradually changes from organic-rich siliceous mixed shale and organic-rich clayey mixed shale to organic-containing siliceous mixed shale. The shale assemblage types of organic-rich siliceous mixed shale and organic-rich clayey mixed shale in small layer ③ has high organic matter abundance,better laminae combination type and development degree,and higher overall gas content and brittleness,which are favorable shale types in the study area.
Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos. 41872133,42072150)and the strategic cooperation agreement between PetroChina and China University of Petroleum(Beijing)(No. ZLZX2020-01-05-03)
Corresponding Authors:
WANG Guiwen,born in 1966,Ph.D., is a professor and doctoral supervisor. He is mainly engaged in sedimentology,reservoir geology and well logging geology. E-mail: wanggw@cup.edu.cn.
About author: HUANG Yuyue,born in 1999,is a Ph.D., candidate in China University of Petroleum(Beijing). He is engaged in sedimentology,reservoir geology and well logging geology. E-mail: hyy990924@163.com.
Cite this article:
HUANG Yuyue,WANG Guiwen,KUANG Lichun et al. Shale type division and logging identification in the Member 1 of Luzhai Formation,Lower Carboniferous,Guizhong Depression[J]. JOPC, 2025, 27(1): 256-270.
HUANG Yuyue,WANG Guiwen,KUANG Lichun et al. Shale type division and logging identification in the Member 1 of Luzhai Formation,Lower Carboniferous,Guizhong Depression[J]. JOPC, 2025, 27(1): 256-270.
[1] 操应长,梁超,韩豫,葸克来,王俊然,籍士超,梅俊芳. 2023. 基于物质来源及成因的细粒沉积岩分类方案探讨. 古地理学报,25(4): 729-741. [Cao Y C,Liang C,Han Y,Xi K L,Wang J R,Ji S C,Mei J F.2023. Discussions on classification scheme for fine-grained sedimentary rocks based on sediments sources and genesis. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),25(4): 729-741] [2] 董大忠,梁峰,管全中,蒋裕强,周尚文,于荣泽,谷一凡,张素荣,漆麟,刘延. 2022. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气优质储层发育模式及识别评价技术. 天然气工业,42(8): 96-111. [Dong D Z,Liang F,Guan Q Z,Jiang Y Q,Zhou S W,Yu R Z,Gu Y F,Zhang S R,Qi L,Liu Y.2022. Development model and identification evaluation technology of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation quality shale gas reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry,42(8): 96-111] [3] 郭旭升,胡宗全,李双建,郑伦举,朱东亚,刘君龙,申宝剑,杜伟,俞凌杰,刘增勤,皇甫瑞麟. 2023. 深层—超深层天然气勘探研究进展与展望. 石油科学通报,8(4): 461-474. [Guo X S,Hu Z Q,Li S J,Zheng L J,Zhu D Y,Liu J L,Shen B J,Du W,Yu L J,Liu Z Q,Huangfu R L.2023. Progress and prospect of natural gas exploration and research in deep and ultra-deep strata. Petroleum Science Bulletin,8(4): 461-474] [4] 何希鹏,何贵松,高玉巧,张龙胜,贺庆,张培先,王伟,黄小贞. 2023. 常压页岩气勘探开发关键技术进展及攻关方向. 天然气工业,43(6): 1-14. [He X P,He G S,Gao Y Q,Zhang L S,He Q,Zhang P X,Wang W,Huang X Z.2023. Progress in and research direction of key technologies for normal-pressure shale gas exploration and development Natural Gas Industry,43(6): 1-14] [5] 贺小标,罗群,李鑫,李映艳,邓远,邱兆轩,韦波. 2024. 陆相混积页岩不同岩相孔隙差异特征及影响机制: 以吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例. 中国矿业大学学报,53(1): 141-157. [He X B,Luo Q,Li X,Li Y Y,Deng Y,Qiu Z X,Wei B.2024. Characteristics of pore differences between different lithofacies of continental mixed shale and the influencing mechanism: an example from the Permian Lucaogou Formation in the Jimusar Depression. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,53(1): 141-157] [6] 黄玉越,王贵文,宋连腾,王松,张益粼,黄立良,赖锦. 2022. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷二叠系风城组页岩储集层裂缝测井识别与有效性分析. 古地理学报,24(3): 540-555. [Huang Y Y,Wang G W,Song L T,Wang S,Zhang Y L,Huang L L,Lai J.2022. Fracture logging identification and effectiveness analysis of shale reservoir of the Permian Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag,Junggar Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),24(3): 540-555] [7] 姜振学,梁志凯,申颍浩,唐相路,吴伟,李卓,薛子鑫,石学文,郭婕. 2023. 川南泸州地区页岩气甜点地质工程一体化关键要素耦合关系及攻关方向. 地球科学,48(1): 110-129. [Jiang Z X,Liang Z K,Shen Y H,Tang X L,Wu W,Li Z,Xue Z X,Shi X W,Guo J.2023. Coupling key factors of shale gas sweet spot and research direction of geology engineering integration in southern Sichuan. Earth Science,48(1): 110-129] [8] 赖锦,白天宇,苏洋,赵飞,李玲,黎雨航,李红斌,王贵文,肖承文. 2024. 烃源岩测井识别与评价方法研究进展. 地质论评,70(2): 721-741. [Lai J,Bai T Y,Su Y,Zhao F,Li L,Li Y H,Li H B,Wang G W,Xiao C W.2024. Researches progress in well log recognition and evaluation of source rocks. Geological Review,70(2): 721-741] [9] 赖锦,李红斌,张梅,白梅梅,赵仪迪,范旗轩,庞小娇,王贵文. 2023. 非常规油气时代测井地质学研究进展. 古地理学报,25(5): 1118-1138. [Lai J,Li H B,Zhang M,Bai M M,Zhao Y D,Fan Q X,Pang X J,Wang G W.2023. Advances in well logging geology in the era of unconventional hydrocarbon resources. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),25(5): 1118-1138] [10] 黎茂稳,马晓潇,金之钧,李志明,蒋启贵,吴世强,李政,徐祖新. 2022. 中国海、陆相页岩层系岩相组合多样性与非常规油气勘探意义. 石油与天然气地质,43(1): 1-25. [Li M W,Ma X X,Jin Z J,Li Z M,Jiang Q G,Wu S Q,Li Z,Xu Z X.2022. Diversity in the lithofacies assemblages of marine and lacustrine shale strata and significance for unconventional petroleum exploration in China. Oil & Gas Geology,43(1): 1-25] [11] 李国欣,刘国强,侯雨庭,赵先然,吴金龙,李伸专,鲜成刚,刘合. 2021. 陆相页岩油有利岩相优选与压裂参数优化方法. 石油学报,42(11): 1405-1416. [Li G X,Liu G Q,Hou Y T,Zhao X R,Wu J L,Li S Z,Xian C G,Liu H.2021. Optimization method of favorable lithofacies and fracturing parameter of continental shale oil. Acta Petrolei Sinica,42(11): 1405-1416] [12] 刘国强,赵先然,袁超,李伸专,刘忠华. 2023. 陆相页岩油宏观结构测井评价及其甜点优选. 中国石油勘探,28(1): 120-134. [Liu G Q,Zhao X R,Yuan C,Li S Z,Liu Z H.2023. Logging evaluation of macro-structure of continental shale oil reservoir and sweet spots selection. China Petroleum Exploration,28(1): 120-134] [13] 刘惠民,张顺,王学军,张鹏飞,李军亮,王勇,魏晓亮,银燕,朱德燕. 2023. 陆相断陷盆地页岩岩相组合类型及特征: 以济阳坳陷东营凹陷沙四上亚段页岩为例. 地球科学,48(1): 30-48. [Liu H M,Zhang S,Wang X J,Zhang P F,Li J L,Wang Y,Wei X L,Yin Y,Zhu D Y.2023. Types and characteristics of shale lithofacies combinations in continental faulted basins: a case study from upper Sub-Member of Es4 in Dongying sag,Jiyang Depression. Earth Science,48(1): 30-48] [14] 庞小娇,王贵文,匡立春,赵飞,李红斌,韩宗晏,白天宇,赖锦. 2023. 沉积环境控制下的页岩岩相组合类型及测井表征: 以松辽盆地古龙凹陷青山口组为例. 古地理学报,25(5): 1156-1175. [Pang X J,Wang G W,Kuang L C,Zhao F,Li H B,Han Z Y,Bai T Y,Lai J.2023. Logging evaluation of lithofacies and their assemblage under control of sedimentary environment: a case study of the Qingshankou Formation in Gulong sag,Songliao Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),25(5): 1156-1175] [15] 覃英伦,雷雨,蒋恕,张仁,张鲁川,岑文攀,卢炳雄. 2022. 桂中坳陷北部下石炭统鹿寨组一段页岩气成藏条件与资源潜力评价. 石油科学通报,7(2): 139-154. [Qin Y L,Lei Y,Jiang S,Zhang R,Zhang L C,Cen W P,Lu B X.2022. Shale gas accumulation conditions and resource potential evaluation of member 1 of the Lower Carboniferous Luzhai Formation in the northern Guizhong depression. Petroleum Science Bulletin,7(2): 139-154] [16] 邵龙义,张天畅. 2023. 泥质岩定义及分类问题的探讨. 古地理学报,25(4): 742-751. [Shao L Y,Zhang T C.2023. Discussion on definition and classification of mudrock. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition),25(4): 742-751] [17] 谭玉涵,张凤生,姚亚彬,吴恒,年涛. 2023. 页岩纹层的测井评价方法研究: 以川南五峰组—龙马溪组为例. 地质科技通报,42(6): 281-296. [Tan Y H,Zhang F S,Yao Y B,Wu H,Nian T.2023. Logging evaluation of shale laminae: a case study from the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations in the southern Sichuan Basin. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,42(6): 281-296] [18] 田瀚,闫伟林,武宏亮,闫学洪,李潮流,郑建东,冯周. 2023. 一种陆相页岩油岩相测井定量识别方法. 地球物理学进展,38(5): 2122-2134. [Tian H,Yan W L,Wu H L,Yan X H,Li C L,Zheng J D,Feng Z.2023. Logging quantitative identification method for lithofacies of continental shale oil. Progress in Geophysics,38(5): 2122-2134] [19] 王祥,赵迎冬,岑文攀,张美玲,黄文芳,黄恒,陈海武,王来军,陈基瑜. 2023. 滇黔桂盆地桂中坳陷下石炭统鹿寨组页岩气勘探潜力. 天然气地球科学,34(9): 1515-1534. [Wang X,Zhao Y D,Cen W P,Zhang M L,Huang W F,Huang H,Chen H W,Wang L J,Chen J Y.2023. Exploration potential of Lower Carboniferous Luzhai Formation shale gas in Guizhong Depression,Dian-Qian-Gui Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience,34(9): 1515-1534] [20] 吴松涛,朱如凯,罗忠,杨智,姜晓华,林敏捷,苏玲. 2022. 中国中西部盆地典型陆相页岩纹层结构与储层品质评价. 中国石油勘探,27(5): 62-72. [Wu S T,Zhu R K,Luo Z,Yang Z,Jiang X H,Ling M J,Su L.2022. Laminar structure of typical continental shales and reservoir quality evaluation in central-western basins in China. China Petroleum Exploration,27(5): 62-72] [21] 武瑾,李海,杨学锋,赵圣贤,郭伟,孙玉平,刘永旸,刘兆龙. 2023. 深层海相页岩纹层类型、组合及其对储层品质的影响: 以四川盆地南部泸州区块龙马溪组一段一亚段为例. 石油学报,44(9): 1517-1531. [Wu J,Li H,Yang X F,Zhao S X,Guo W,Sun Y P,Liu Y Y,Liu Z L.2023. Types and combinations of deep marine shale laminae and their effects on reservoir quality: a case study of the first submember of Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Luzhou block,south Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,44(9): 1517-1531] [22] 向克满,史洪亮,王幸蒙,赵勇,董晓霞,庞河清,张烨毓. 2023. 川南地区深层页岩气储层特征及含气性主控因素. 东北石油大学学报,47(3): 44-55. [Xiang K M,Shi H L,Wang X M,Zhao Y,Dong X X,Pang H Q,Zhang Y Y.2023. Reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of gas content of deep shale gas in Southern Sichuan Basin. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,47(3): 44-55] [23] 邢浩婷,匡立春,伍坤宇,张静,张娜,张梦麟,邓立本,陆振华,李亚锋,张庆辉. 2024. 柴达木盆地英雄岭页岩岩相特征及有利源储组合. 中国石油勘探,29(2): 70-82. [Xing H T,Kuang L C,Wu K Y,Zhang J,Zhang N,Zhang M L,Deng L B,Lu Z H,Li Y F,Zhang Q H.2024. Lithofacies characteristics and favorable source rock-reservoir combination of Yingxiongling shale in Qaidam Basin. China Petroleum Exploration,29(2): 70-82] [24] 熊周海,操应长,王冠民,梁超,石晓明,李明鹏,付尧,赵寿强. 2019. 湖相细粒沉积岩纹层结构差异对可压裂性的影响. 石油学报,40(1): 74-85. [Xiong Z H,Cao Y C,Wang G M,Liang C,Shi X M,Li M P,Fu Y,Zhao S Q.2019. Influence of laminar structure differences on the fracability of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary rocks. Acta Petrolei Sinica,40(1): 74-85] [25] 于洲,黄正良,李维岭,李靖,曹斌风,吴东旭,胡琮,吴兴宁,朱文博. 2023. 鄂尔多斯盆地中奥陶统乌拉力克组海相页岩岩相类型及优质储层发育特征. 天然气工业,43(3): 23-33. [Yu Z,Huang Z L,Li W L,Li J,Cao B F,Wu D X,Hu Z,Wu X N,Zhu W B.2023. Lithofacies types and high-quality reservoir development characteristics of marine shale in the Middle Ordovician Wulalike Formation,Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Industry,43(3): 23-33] [26] 曾棒,刘小平,刘国勇,王绍春,李国永. 2021. 陆相泥页岩层系岩相测井识别与预测: 以南堡凹陷拾场次洼为例. 地质科技通报,40(1): 69-79. [Zeng B,Liu X P,Liu G Y,Wang S C,Li G Y.2021. Logging identification and prediction of lithofacies of lacustrine shale system in Shichang Sub-Sag,Nanpu Depression. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,40(1): 69-79] [27] 张益粼,王贵文,宋连腾,包萌,黄玉越,赖锦,王松,黄立良. 2023. 页岩岩相测井表征方法: 以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组为例. 地球物理学进展,38(1): 393-408. [Zhang Y L,Wang G W,Song L T,Bao M,Huang Y Y,Lai J,Wang S,Huang L L.2023. A logging identification method of shale lithofacies: a study of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag,Junggar Basin. Progress in Geophysics,38(1): 393-408] [28] 赵建华,金之钧,金振奎,温馨,耿一凯,颜彩娜,聂海宽. 2016. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩岩相类型与沉积环境. 石油学报,37(5): 572-586. [Zhao J H,Jin Z J,Jin Z K,Wen X,Geng Y K,Yan C N,Nie H K.2016. Lithofacies types and sedimentary environment of shale in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations,Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica,37(5): 572-586] [29] 朱如凯,李梦莹,杨静儒,张素荣,蔡毅,曹琰,康缘. 2022. 细粒沉积学研究进展与发展方向. 石油与天然气地质,43(2): 251-264. [Zhu R K,Li M Y,Yang J R,Zhang S R,Cai Y,Cao Y,Kang Y.2022. Advances and trends of fine-grained sedimentology. Oil & Gas Geology,43(2): 251-264] [30] 邹才能,赵群,王红岩,熊伟,董大忠,于荣泽. 2022. 中国海相页岩气主要特征及勘探开发主体理论与技术. 天然气工业,42(8): 1-13. [Zou C N,Zhao Q,Wang H Y,Xiong W,Dong D Z,Yu R Z.2022. The main characteristics of marine shale gas and the theory & technology of exploration and development in China. Natural Gas Industry,42(8): 1-13] [31] Avanzini A,Balossino P,Brignoli M,Spelta E,Tarchiani C.2016. Lithologic and geomechanical facies classification for sweet spot identification in gas shale reservoir. Interpretation,4(3): SL21-SL31. [32] Han Z,Wang G,Wu H,Feng Z,Tian H,Xie Y,Wu H.2024. Lithofacies characteristics of Gulong shale and its influence on reservoir physical properties. Energies(Basel),17(4): 779. [33] Huang Y,Wang G,Zhang Y,Xi J,Huang L,Wang S,Zhang Y,Lai J,Jiang C.2023. Logging evaluation of pore structure and reservoir quality in shale oil reservoir: the Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag,Junggar Basin,China. Marine and Petroleum Geology,156: 106454. [34] Jarvie D M,Hill R J,Ruble T E,Pollastro R M.2007. Unconventional shale-gas systems: the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. AAPG Bulletin,91(4): 475-499. [35] Pang X,Wang G,Kuang L,Lai J,Gao Y,Zhao Y,Li H,Wang S,Bao M,Liu S,Liu B.2022. Prediction of multiscale laminae structure and reservoir quality in fine-grained sedimentary rocks: the Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag,Junggar Basin. Petroleum Science,19(6): 2549-2571. [36] Pang X,Wang G,Mountney N P,Kuang L,Zhao X,Zhao Y,Li H,Han Z,Tian H.2023. Prediction of lamina structure and reservoir quality in shale using well logs: the Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation,Gulong Sag,Songliao Basin,China. Geoenergy Science and Engineering,227: 211827. [37] Qian C,Li X,Zhang Q,Shen W,Guo W,Lin W,Han L,Cui Y,Huang Y,Pei X,Yu Z.2023. Reservoir characteristics of different shale lithofacies and their effects on the gas content of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation,southern Sichuan Basin,China. Geoenergy Science and Engineering,225: 211701. [38] Wang S,Wang G,Huang L,Song L,Zhang Y,Li D,Huang Y.2021. Logging evaluation of lamina structure and reservoir quality in shale oil reservoir of Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag,China. Marine and Petroleum Geology,133: 105299.