实用肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 107-111.doi: 10.11904/j.issn.1002-3070.2018.02.003

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

术后辅助化疗后复发转移与初次诊断的IV期NSCLC一线化疗疗效分析

翟可可1, 高媛媛2, 冯晓1, 许静文1, 宫玉芳1, 孟庆威1   

  1. 1.哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院肿瘤内科(哈尔滨 150081);
    2.宁夏医科大学总医院肿瘤医院肿瘤内科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-09 出版日期:2018-04-28 发布日期:2018-05-09
  • 通讯作者: 孟庆威,E-mail:mqwei@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:翟可可,女,(1990-),硕士研究生,从事恶性肿瘤转移早期筛查及肺癌综合治疗的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:81672931);国家博士后基金项目(编号:2016M591552);黑龙江省博士后基金项目(编号:LBH-Z16254)

Analysis of first-line NSCLC chemotherapy in the phase Ⅳ patients with distant metastasis and first diagnosis after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy

ZHAI Keke1, GAO Yuanyuan2, FENG Xiao1, XU Jingwen1, GONG Yufang1, MENG Qingwei1   

  1. 1.Department of Medical Oncology,Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital,Harbin 150081,China;
    2.Department of Medical Oncology,General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University Tumor Hospital
  • Received:2018-01-09 Online:2018-04-28 Published:2018-05-09

摘要: 目的 既往行根治性手术治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,即使进行了系统的术后辅助化疗,仍有很多不可避免的复发,甚至远处转移。同时,很多患者在初治时即为Ⅳ期。本文旨在探讨术后辅助化疗后远处转移的NSCLC患者一线化疗(First-line chemotherapy at recurrence post-adjuvant chemotherapy,FCRPC)与初治Ⅳ期NSCLC患者一线化疗(Initial first-line chemotherapy,IFC)的疗效对比。方法 研究对象为603例远处转移非小细胞肺癌患者,其中73例为FCRPC组,530例为IFC组。采用倾向性评分匹配的统计学方法平衡两组间的临床特征,卡方检验进行两组间近期疗效对比。并采用Cox回归分析法和Kaplan-Meier分析法进行生存分析。结果 在远处转移NSCLC患者中,FCRPC组的客观有效率(ORR)及疾病控制率(DCR)与IFC组无统计学差异(ORR率:FCRPC组27.4% vs. IFC组24.7%,P=0.851;DCR率:FCRPC组78.1% vs. IFC组65.6%,P=0.140)。FCRPC组与IFC组的中位无进展生存期(中位PFS:9.8个月 vs. 8.5个月,P=0.337)与中位总生存期(中位OS:20.0个月 vs. 14.4个月,P=0.087)均无统计学差异。结论 术后辅助化疗后远处转移NSCLC与初治Ⅳ期NSCLC患者一线化疗的预后无统计学差异。

关键词: 非小细胞肺癌, 远处转移, 一线化疗, 生存分析, 疗效评价

Abstract: Objective In patients with non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)undergoing radical surgery,there were still many inevitable recurrences and distant metastases,even after systemic postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.At the same time,many patients were in the stage Ⅳ at the time of initial treatment.The aims of this study were to investigate and compare the first-line chemotherapy(First-line Chemotherapy at Recurrence Post-adjuvant Chemotherapy,FCRPC)in NSCLC patients with distant metastasis after adjuvant chemotherapy with initial treatment at the phase Ⅳ of NSCLC patients with first-line chemotherapy(Initial First-line Chemotherapy,IFC).Methods A total of 603 patients with distant metastatic NSCLC were collected in this study.Among them,73 of them were FCRPC and 530 of them for IFC.Statistical methods for propensity score matching were used to balance the clinical features between FCRPC and IFC groups.Chi-square test was used to compare the short-term efficacy between FCRPC and IFC groups.Survival analysis was performed using regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis.Results There was no significant difference in Objective response rate(ORR)and disease control rate(DCR)between FCRPC and IFC groups in NSCLC patients with distant metastases(ORR rate:27.46% in the FCRPC group,24.7% in the PFC group,P=0.851 and DCR rate:78.1% in the FCRPC group,65.6% in the PFC group,P=0.140).There was also no significant difference in the median progression-free survival(9.8 months in the FCRPC group and 8.5 months in the PFC group,P=0.337)and median overall survival(20.0 months in the FCRPC group and 14.4 months in the PFC group,P=0.087).Conclusion There is no significant difference in the prognosis of first-line chemotherapy between NSCLC patients with distant metastases and with initial treatment at the stage Ⅳ after adjuvant chemotherapy.

Key words: Non-small cell lung cancer, Distant metastasis, First-line chemotherapy, Survival analysis, Efficacy evaluation

中图分类号: