实用肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 391-395.doi: 10.11904/j.issn.1002-3070.2021.05.001

• 流行病学研究 •    下一篇

乌鲁木齐市2014—2018年度乳腺癌筛查结果分析

周天虹, 顾秀瑛, 姚芳, 宋述铭   

  1. 新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院(乌鲁木齐 830011)
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-07 修回日期:2021-04-22 出版日期:2021-10-28 发布日期:2021-10-25
  • 通讯作者: 宋述铭,E-mail:sdugood@163.com
  • 作者简介:周天虹,女,(1990-),硕士,主管医师,从事肿瘤流行病学的研究。

Analysis for screening results of breast cancer in Urumqi from 2014 to 2018

ZHOU Tianhong, GU Xiuying, YAO Fang, SONG Shuming   

  1. Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830011,China
  • Received:2020-12-07 Revised:2021-04-22 Online:2021-10-28 Published:2021-10-25

摘要: 目的 对乌鲁木齐市乳腺癌高危人群进行筛查,探讨筛查的参与率,超声和X线摄影检查对乳腺疾病的检出率及乳腺癌的早诊率。方法 在40~74岁乌鲁木齐市女性居民中,通过防癌风险评估问卷评估出乳腺癌高危人群;经知情同意后,40~44岁采用超声检查,BI-RADS 3级以上结果加做X线摄影检查;45岁以上采用超声联合X线摄影检查。BI-RADS 3级为可疑阳性,BI-RADS 4级及以上为阳性;对检查结果进行分析。结果 问卷调查共评估出乳腺癌高危人群27 704人,实际完成筛查11 752人,参与率为42.4%;其中50~59岁年龄组的参与率最高(46.3%),不同年龄组间参与率差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。超声检查占位检出率为27.1%,乳腺X线检查占位检出率为61.3%,联合检查占位检出率为68.4%,不同检查技术占位检出率差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。各年龄段乳腺X线占位检出率均高于超声检查,联合检查的占位检出率最高,各年龄段不同检查技术占位检出率差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。三种技术比较,不同年龄段乳腺超声+X线摄影联合检查可疑阳性和阳性检出率均较高,不同检查技术在各年龄段中阳性病变检出率差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。阳性病变中随访到39人进行了病理检查,诊断为乳腺癌,检出率为0.33%(332/10万),早诊率为79.5%。结论 以高危风险评估为基础,评估出高危人群,再联合超声及X线检查,可以提高早期乳腺癌的检出率。

关键词: 筛查, 乳腺癌, 超声, X线, 检出率

Abstract: Objective The aims of this study were to screening of high-risk population of breast cancer in Urumqi,to discuss the participation rate of the screening,the detection rate of breast disease by ultrasound and X-ray photography,and the early diagnosis rate of breast cancer. Methods Among female residents of Urumqi between 40 and 74 years old,the high-risk population of breast cancer was assessed through the questionnaire of anti-cancer risk assessment.After informed consent,the 40 to 44 years old women were examined by ultrasound,and the results of BI-RADS level 3 or higher results were further examined by X-ray examination.Ultrasound combined with X-ray examination were used to women over 45 years of age.The BI-RADS level 3 was regarded as suspicious positive,BI-RADS level 4 and above were regarded as positive.All test results were further analyzed. Results A total of 27,704 at high risk of breast cancer were assessed by questionnaire survey,and 11,752 people actually completed the screening with a participation rate of 42.4%.Among them,the 50~59 years old age group had the highest participation rate(46.3%),and the difference between different age groups was statistically significant(P<0.001).The detection rate of ultrasound examination was 27.1%,the detection rate of X-ray mammography was 61.3%,and the detection rate of combined examination was 68.4%.The difference of detection rate was statistically significant with different examination techniques(P<0.001).The detection rate of X-ray mammography in all ages was higher than that of ultrasound examination.The combined examination had the highest detection rate,there was significant difference in the detection rate of different examination techniques in different age groups(P<0.001).Compared with the three techniques,the suspicious positive and positive detection rates of combined ultrasound and X-ray mammography were higher in different age groups,and the difference in positive lesion detection rates of different examination techniques in different age groups was statistically significant(P<0.001).Among the positive lesions,39 people were followed up for pathological examination,and were diagnosed as breast cancer.The detection rate was 0.33%(332/100,000),and the rate of early diagnosis was 79.5%. Conclusion Based on high risk assessment and assessing high-risk groups,the ultrasound combined with and X-ray examination can improve the detection rate of early breast cancer.

Key words: Screening, Breast cancer, Ultrasonography, X-ray, Detection rate

中图分类号: