实用肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 209-213.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3070.2012.03.004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

对比3DCRT和IGRT技术对肝癌放射治疗的作用与评价

董文雷, 刘莉莉, 陈林, 胡洪涛, 白彦灵, 胡松柳, 冯丽娜, 李洋, 徐威威   

  1. 哈尔滨医科大学附属第三医院放疗技术中心(哈尔滨 150081)
  • 收稿日期:2011-12-19 出版日期:2012-06-28 发布日期:2014-12-03
  • 通讯作者: 陈林,E-mail:chenlinhyd@yahoo.cn
  • 作者简介:董文雷,男,(1982-),本科,从事肿瘤放射治疗技术工作
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省科技攻关课题(GC10C304-3)

3DCRT and IGRT therapy technology for liver carcinoma function and evaluation

DONG Wenlei,LIU Lili,CHEN Lin,HU Hongtao,BAI Yanling,HU Songliu,FENG Lina,LI Yang,XU Weiwei   

  1. Department of Radiation,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150081
  • Received:2011-12-19 Online:2012-06-28 Published:2014-12-03

摘要: 目的 通过比较三维适形放疗(3DCRT)和影像引导放疗(IGRT)两种治疗技术,评价两种治疗技术对肝癌放疗患者生存质量的影响。方法 2009年3月—2010年7月22例肝区病灶放疗患者,其中3DCRT组12例,常规放射治疗;IGRT组10例,每日治疗前以CBCT+ABC技术采集患者CBCT图像,根据靶区及邻近器官进行治疗计划CT图像和CBCT容积图像的配准,记录X(TableShiftLat)、Y(TableShiftLong)、Z(TableShiftVert)三个方向的偏移数据,并校正摆位误差,记做CBCT,为包含摆位误差的放疗分次间的重复性;治疗结束后再次行CBCT扫描记做CBCT,表明在照射期间内靶区及脏器位置的重复性,即个体化放疗分次内肿瘤运动。利用SPSS软件计算IGRT+ABC技术在线治疗校正下的肝脏肿瘤放疗的平均误差及标准差。结果 应用ABC技术时,放疗分次间的重复性较差,而放疗分次内的重复性较好。计算得到的现有无影像引导的摆位规范下CTV-PTV外放为X为0.8 cm、Y为0.9 cm、Z为0.9 cm;现有影像引导(IGRT)的摆位规范下CTV-PTV外放为X为0.3 cm、Y为0.4 cm、Z为0.2 cm。1、2年生存率3DCRT组和IGRT 组分别为58.3%和16.7%、70% 和 20%,中位生存期分别为12、16个月。结论 肝脏作为软组织体,在器官运动过程中各点的位移幅度不同,治疗过程中,因软组织内部不同位置的形变差异无法估量,治疗误差将会有很大不确定性。3DCRT与IGRT两种治疗结果相比,从近期疗效看,IGRT组局部控制率有提高,放疗反应明显减轻。1,2年生存率IGRT组有提高,中位生存期延长。IGRT的应用使肝癌的放射治疗进入一个新的阶段,值得临床进一步研究。

Abstract: Objective According to different technology,to evaluate of the quality of survival liver cancer patients with radiation.Methods From March 2009 to July 2010,22 patents from two independent prospective studies were included in the analysis.12 patients were treated by three dimensional conformal radiotherapy ,and 10 patients by Image Guided Radiation Therapy.CBCT images were got with Elekta CBCT+ABC system before treatment and registered with plan CT images according the margins of tumor target.The results were recorded before CBCT.After treatment,we got CBCT images and do the registration,got CBCT.The results were analyzed with SPSS.Results According to Stroom formula ,when without correcting of dose ,the margins of CTV-PTV with IGRT were X=0.3cm、Y=0.4cm and Z=0.2cm respectively;The margins of CTV-PTV without IGRT were X=0.8cm、Y=0.9cm and Z=0.9cm respectively.The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 58.3%,16.7% and 70% ,20%,respectirely.The respective median survivals were 12 months and 16 months.Conclusions With the IGRT,the margin of CTV-PTV was diminished by 5mm.As the soft organ,the whole liver has different passion during the organ moving.Just using the margin of liver as the registration point,moving in the organ is inestimable,and there will be uncertain in image registration.IGRT is safe and effective for liver cancer patients.The short-term effect is satisfactory.

中图分类号: