实用肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 20-25.doi: 10.11904/j.issn.1002-3070.2022.01.004

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

恩度静脉持续泵入与滴注联合含铂双药方案化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效与安全性比较

张梦茹, 曹德东, 戈伟   

  1. 武汉大学人民医院肿瘤中心(武汉 430060)
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-04 修回日期:2021-11-22 出版日期:2022-02-28 发布日期:2022-01-21
  • 通讯作者: 戈伟,E-mail:gewei514@126.com
  • 作者简介:张梦茹,女,(1997-),硕士研究生,从事肿瘤靶向治疗、肿瘤微循环与放射性治疗、肿瘤综合诊治的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家青年科学基金项目(编号:81700208)

Comparison of efficacy and safety of Endostar intravenous continuous pumping and dripping combined with platinum-containing dual-drug regimen chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

ZHANG Mengru, CAO Dedong, GE Wei   

  1. Center of Oncology,Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China
  • Received:2021-04-04 Revised:2021-11-22 Online:2022-02-28 Published:2022-01-21

摘要: 目的 探讨恩度静脉持续泵入与滴注联合含铂双药方案一线化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(Non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的临床疗效与安全性。方法 选取武汉大学人民医院2011年12月—2020年12月收治的100例病理分型为腺癌的晚期NSCLC患者作为研究对象,观察组为恩度静脉持续泵入(CIV)组,采取恩度静脉持续泵入联合培美曲塞+奈达铂化疗方案进行治疗,共50例;对照组为恩度静脉滴注(DIV)组,采取恩度静脉持续滴注联合培美曲塞+奈达铂化疗方案进行治疗,共50例。比较两组患者总有效率(Overall response rate,ORR)、疾病控制率(Disease control rate,DCR)、毒副反应发生情况,并分析晚期NSCLC患者无进展生存期(Progress-free survival,PFS)的影响因素。结果 观察组ORR为38.0%,高于对照组的18.0%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.026)。观察组DCR为92.0%,高于对照组的74.0%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.017)。毒副反应发生情况比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。Cox回归分析结果表明,给药方式不是晚期NSCLC患者PFS的影响因素(P=0.340),放疗为晚期NSCLC患者PFS的独立影响因素(P<0.05),接受了放疗的患者PFS长于未接受放疗的患者(HR=1.708,95% CI:1.041~2.801)。结论 恩度静脉持续泵入联合含铂双药方案一线化疗治疗晚期NSCLC患者的ORR及DCR高于恩度静脉持续滴注联合含铂双药方案,且不会加重相关毒副作用,其中接受放疗的患者肿瘤进展风险低于未接受放疗的患者。

关键词: 非小细胞肺癌, 恩度, 静脉持续泵入, 静脉滴注, 含铂双药化疗

Abstract: Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous continuous pumping and infusion of Endostar combined with platinum-containing dual-drug regimen as first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods A total of 100 advanced NSCLC patients with pathological classification of adenocarcinoma who were admitted to Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from December 2011 to December 2020 were selected as the research objects.The observation group was the CIV group,a total of 50 patients in the group were treated with Endostar intravenous continuous pumping combined with pemetrexed and nedaplatin.The control group was the DIV group,with the other 50 patients treated with Endostar intravenous infusion combined with pemetrexed and nedaplatin chemotherapy regimen.The overall response rate(ORR),disease control rate(DCR),and the occurrence of toxic and side effects between the two groups of patients were compared.Results The ORR of the observation group was 38.0%,which was higher than that of the control group(18.0%).The difference was statistically significant(P=0.026).The DCR of the observation group was 92.0%,which was higher than that of the control group(74.0%),and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.017).The occurrence of toxic and side effects was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The results of Cox regression analysis showed that the method of administration was not a factor influencing progression-free survival(PFS)in patients with advanced NSCLC(P=0.340),and radiotherapy was an independent factor affecting PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC(P<0.05).The PFS of patients who received radiotherapy was longer than that of patients who did not receive radiotherapy(HR=1.708,95% CI:1.041~2.801).Conclusion The ORR and DCR of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with continuous intravenous pumping combined with first-line chemotherapy with platinum-containing two-drug regimen were higher than those treated with intravenous infusion,without aggravating related toxic and side effects.Among them,the risk of tumor progression in patients receiving radiotherapy was lower than that in patients not receiving radiotherapy.

Key words: Non-small cell lung cancer, Endostar, Continuous intravenous pumping, Intravenous infusion, Platinum-containing dual-drug chemotherapy

中图分类号: